Proceedings
of the 11th Annual
International
Conference On Comparative Cognition
Sponsored by the
Comparative Cognition Society*
Radisson Hotel
President: Suzanne MacDonald
President-Elect:
Tom Zentall
Secretary: Michael Brown
Treasurer: Ron Weisman
Past
Presidents: Bob Cook ,
Ed Wasserman, Ron Weisman
Program Committee: Michael
Brown (Chair), Suzanne MacDonald, Tom Zentall
CO3-2004
Program Summary |
||
|
Time |
Page |
Wednesday |
|
|
Welcome Reception and Check-In |
3:30-5:00 |
7 |
Opening Comments |
5:50 |
7 |
Spatial Learning Processes |
6:00-7:03 |
7 |
Equivalence Learning and the Same/Different Concept |
7:10-7:57 |
8 |
Learning, Choice, Reasoning |
8:35-9:36 |
8 |
Theory of Mind and Metacognition |
9:45-10:15 |
9 |
Thursday |
|
|
Ordinality, Magnitude, and Distance |
12:00-1:10 |
10 |
Timing Processes |
1:20-2:22 |
10 |
Social Learning |
2:30-3:09 |
11 |
Poster Session |
3:45–6:15 |
12 |
Reception (Posters May Remain on Display) |
8:30 |
|
Friday |
|
|
Spatial Cues and Spatial Control |
12:30-1:24 |
18 |
Mechanisms of Learning |
1:35-2:28 |
19 |
Predators, Prey, and Feeding |
2:30 – 2:53 |
19 |
A Celebration of the Influence of Donald Blough |
3:40 – 4:55 |
20 |
Master Lecture: Donald Blough |
5:10 – 6:10 |
20 |
Banquet (Requires Separate Registration & Fee) |
7:15 |
|
Saturday |
|
|
Business Meeting of The Comparative Cognition Society |
10:30-11:30 |
21 |
Group Photo Shoot |
11:35 |
21 |
Communication |
11:45-12:31 |
21 |
Comparative and General Process Approaches |
12:40-1:40 |
22 |
Discrimination Learning |
1:50-3:15 |
22 |
Motion and Rhythm |
3:55-4:42 |
24 |
Categories and Concepts |
4:50-6:35 |
24 |
Reception |
9:00 |
|
Conference Participants
Name |
Institution |
Email Address |
Presentations |
Lorraine Allan |
McMaster University |
allan@mcmaster.ca |
11 |
Francisco Arcediano |
Auburn University |
arcedfr@auburn.edu |
13 |
Suzette Astley |
Cornell College |
sastley@cornellcollege.edu |
|
Thierry Aubin |
NAMC CNRS |
thierry.aubin@ibaic.u-psud.fr |
81, 83 |
Stephanie Babb |
Univeristy of Georgia |
sbabb@arches.uga.edu |
31 |
Melissa Bateson |
University of Newcastle |
Melissa.Bateson@ncl.ac.uk |
21 |
Gordon Bauer |
New College of Florida |
bauer@ncf.edu |
29, 82 |
Aaron Blaisdell |
UCLA |
blaisdell@psych.ucla.edu |
3, 4, 32 |
Donald Blough |
Brown University |
donald_blough@brown.edu |
80 |
Alyshia Bowden |
Auburn University |
Talula000@yahoo.com |
|
Sally Boysen |
Ohio State University |
boysen.1@osu.edu |
16, 36 |
Elizabeth Brannon |
Duke Uuniversity |
brannon@duke.edu |
33, 41, 47 |
Gabriela Bravo |
Franklin & Marshall College |
Gabriela.Bravo@fandm.edu |
95 |
David Brodbeck |
Memorial University |
brodbeck@swqc.mun.ca |
1 |
Daniel Brooks |
Tufts University |
|
7 |
Michael Brown |
Villanova University |
michael.brown@villanova.edu |
62 |
Jessica Cantlon |
Duke University |
jfc2@duke.edu |
27, 33 |
Adrienne Cardwell |
Mirage, Dolphin Habitat |
acardwell@mirage.com |
30 |
Dana Church |
University of Ottawa |
Dana_bumblebee@hotmail.com |
34 |
Russell Church |
Brown University |
22, 76 |
|
Coco Cioroiu |
Columbia Univesity |
cmc192@columbia.edu |
|
Jerry Cohen |
University of Windsor |
a77@uwindsor.ca |
2 |
Michael Commons |
Harvard Medical School |
commons@tiac.net |
85, 86 |
Robert Cook |
Tufts University |
Robert.Cook@tufts.edu |
7, 75, 96, 98 |
Jessica Crast |
University of Georgia |
crastj@uga.edu |
|
Jonathon Crystal |
University of Georgia |
jcrystal@uga.edu |
25, 31, 52 |
Caroline Delong |
University of Hawaii |
delong@hawaii.edu |
91 |
Kelly DiGian |
University of Kentucky |
kelly.digian@villanova.edu |
93 |
Kirsten Donald |
Dolphin Research Center |
kirsten@dolphins.org |
|
Martha Escobar |
Auburn University |
escobmc@auburn.edu |
13 |
Wendi Fellner |
The Living Seas, Epcot |
wendi@wendiops.com |
29, 97 |
Lanny Fields |
Queens College, CUNY |
lanny_fields@qc.edu |
|
Sylvain Fiset |
Université de Moncton in Edmundston |
sfiset@umce.ca |
66 |
Molly Flaherty |
Columbia University |
mef129@columbia.edu |
106 |
Theresa Foster |
University of Florida |
tafoster@ufl.edu |
14 |
Stephen Fountain |
Kent State University |
sfountai@kent.edu |
18 |
Jennifer Fugate |
Emory University |
jbinzak@emory.edu |
|
Ellen Furlong |
The Ohio State University |
furlong.22@osu.edu |
36 |
Joseph Garcia |
Columbus State University |
garcia_joseph@colstate.edu |
56 |
Brett Gibson |
University of Iowa |
brett-gibson@uiowa.edu |
20 |
Paulo Guilhardi |
Brown University |
Paulo_guilhardi@brown.edu |
22, 24 |
Elizabeth Hallinan |
Harvard University |
hallinan@fas.harvard.edu |
37 |
Robert Hampton |
NIH-NIMH |
robert@ln.nimh.nih.gov |
38 |
Kara Hannibal |
University of Florida |
hannibal@ufl.edu |
|
Heidi Harley |
New College of Florida |
harley@ncf.edu |
30, 84, 97 |
Sharon Himmanen |
Lehman College |
shimmanen@mindspring.com |
|
Megan Hoffman |
Florida International University |
mhoffm01@fiu.edu |
39, 90 |
Erica Hoy |
University of Georgia |
ea_hoy@hotmail.com |
40 |
Scott Husband |
University of South Florida |
husband@luna.cas.usf.edu |
51, 94 |
Satoru Ishikawa |
Hokkaido University |
ishi_s@complex.eng.hokudai.ac.jp |
102 |
Ei-Ichi Izawa |
Nagoya Univ, JAPAN |
izawa@agr.nagoya-u.ac.jp |
|
Lucia Jacobs |
University of California - Berkeley |
Jacobs@uclink.berkeley.edu |
|
Kerry Jordan |
Duke University |
kej8@duke.edu |
41 |
Alan Kamil |
University of Nebraska-Lincoln |
akamil@unlserve.unl.edu |
20, 46, 63, 71, 105 |
Juliane Kaminski |
MPI for Evolutionary Anthropology |
Kaminski@eva.mpg.de |
42 |
Jeffrey Katz |
Auburn University |
katzjef@auburn.edu |
8 |
Richard Keen |
Brown University |
Richard_keen@brown.edu |
22 |
Debbie Kelly |
University of Nebraska |
dkelly@unlserve.unl.edu |
63 |
Kimberly Kirkpatrick |
University of York |
kk12@york.ac.uk |
26, 70 |
Emily Klein |
University of Kentucky |
edklei0@uky.edu |
28 |
Angie Koban |
Tufts University |
|
98 |
Tamar Kornblum |
Columbia University |
tk536@columbia.edu |
|
Nate Kornell |
Columbia University |
nk267@columbia.edu |
43, 106 |
Shannon Kundey |
Yale University |
shannon.kundey@yale.edu |
44, 49 |
Taichi Kusayama |
Keio University |
kusa@psy.flet.keio.ac.jp |
92 |
Olga Lazareva |
University of Iowa |
olga-lazareva@uiowa.edu |
78, 103 |
Stephen Lea |
University of Exeter |
S.E.G.Lea@exeter.ac.uk |
104 |
Katherine Leighty |
University of Georgia |
kleighty@uga.edu |
45 |
Kenneth Leising |
University of California at Los Angeles |
kleising@ucla.edu |
3, 4 |
Jody Lewis |
University of Nebraska |
JLewis@unlserve.unl.edu |
46 |
Kerrie Lewis |
Duke University |
Kerrie.lewis@duke.edu |
33, 47 |
Kristy Lindemann |
University of California at Santa Cruz |
klindem79@yahoo.com |
9 |
Charles Locurto |
College of the Holy Cross |
clocurto@holycross.edu |
87 |
Suzanne MacDonald |
York University |
suzmac@yorku.ca |
|
Mika MacInnis |
Brown University |
Mika_MacInnis@Brown.edu |
23 |
Hiroshi Makino |
Chiba University |
hmakino@cogsci.l.chiba-u.ac.jp |
99 |
Tracy Martin |
University of Kentucky |
Tracy92870@yahoo.com |
101 |
Nicolas Mathevon |
NAMC CNRS |
mathevon@univ-st-etienne.fr |
81, 83 |
Tammy McKenzie |
University of Western Ontario |
tmckenzi@uwo.ca |
107 |
Eduardo Mercado III |
Rutgers University |
emiii@buffalo.edu |
108 |
Ralph Miller |
State University of NY at Binghamton |
RMILLER@binghamton.edu |
67 |
Patrice Miller |
Salem State College |
patrice.miller@salemstate.edu |
85, 86 |
Chrissy Miner |
Wesleyan College |
cminer@wesleyancollege.edu |
|
Christina Miner |
Emory University |
cminer@emory.edu |
49 |
Tammy Moscrip |
Columbia University |
tdm12@columbia.edu |
50 |
Tamo Nakamura |
University of Texas Health Science Center |
tamo.nakamuro.uth.tmc.edu |
|
Itzel Orduna |
Rutgers University |
orduna@axon.rutgers.edu |
108 |
Julia Orth |
New College of Florida |
jorth@ncf.edu |
84 |
Linda Parker |
Wilfrid Laurier University |
lparker@wlu.ca |
73 |
Tadd Patton |
University of South Florida |
tbpatton@helios.acomp.usf.edu |
51 |
Guillermo Paz-y-Mino |
University of Nebraska |
pazymino@unlserve.unl.edu |
105 |
Oskar Pineño |
SUNY-Binghamton |
opineno@binghamton.edu |
67 |
Matthew Pizzo |
University of Georgia |
mpizzo@arches.uga.edu |
52 |
Tyson Platt |
Auburn University |
platty@auburn.edu |
13 |
Jesse Purdy |
Southwestern University |
purdy@southwestern.edu |
53 |
Lisa Pytka |
New College of Florida |
lisa.pytka@ncf.edu |
|
Friederike Range |
University of Pennsylvania |
range@sas.upenn.edu |
|
Mary Jo Rattermann |
Franklin and Marshall College |
Maryjo.Rattermann@fandm.edu |
6 |
Donald Riley |
University of California - Berkeley |
rokdov@socrates.berkeley.edu |
|
Bill Roberts |
University of Western Ontario |
77, 107 |
|
Karen Roper |
Wake Forest University |
roperk@wfu.edu |
69 |
Carrie Rosengart |
University of Georgia |
crosenga@arches.uga.edu |
54 |
James Rowan |
Bridgewater College |
jrowan@bridgewater.edu |
19, 49, 59 |
Candy Rowe |
University of Newcastle |
candy.rowe@ncl.ac.uk |
72, 74 (W) |
Rona Russell |
University of York |
R.Russell@psych.york.ac.uk |
26 |
Angelo Santi |
Wilfrid Laurier University |
asanti@wlu.ca |
61 |
Kathryn Saulsgiver |
University of Florida |
Kas@ufl.edu |
55 |
Kosuke Sawa |
UCLA |
kosuke@ucla.edu |
3, 4, 32 |
Nestor Schmajuk |
Duke University |
nestor@duke.edu |
68 |
Mark Schmidt |
Columbus State University |
schmidt_mark@colstate.edu |
56 |
Bennett Schwartz |
Florida International University |
schwartb@fiu.edu |
39, 90 |
Martin Shapiro |
California State University, Fresno |
mashapiro@csufresno.edu |
12 |
Rebecca Singer |
University of Kentucky |
rasing2@uky.edu |
64 |
Shannon Skov-Rackette |
University of Toronto |
Shannon.Skov.Rackette@utoronto.ca |
65 |
Lisa Son |
Barnard College |
lson@barnard.edu |
106 |
Marcia Spetch |
University of Alberta |
mspetch@ualberta.ca |
57 |
David Stahlman |
Franklin & Marshall College |
William.Stahlman@fandm.edu |
95 |
Janice Steirn |
Georgia Southern University |
JSteirn@GaSou.edu |
|
Jeffrey Stevens |
Harvard University |
jstevens@fas.harvard.edu |
37, 58 |
Fred Stollnitz |
National Science Foundation |
fstollni@nsf.gov |
|
Bradley Sturz |
Auburn University |
sturzbr@auburn.edu |
8 |
Francys Subiaul |
Columbia University |
subiaul@aol.com |
27 |
Karyl Swartz |
Lehman College/CUNY |
kswartz@lehman.cuny.edu |
39 |
Nina Tarner |
Gettysburg College |
nina_tarner@hotmail.com |
|
Herbert Terrace |
Columbia University |
terrace@columbia.edu |
17, 27, 43, 48, 50, 60, 106 |
Genevieve Tessier |
Florida International University |
Gtess001@fiu.edu |
90 |
Roger Thompson |
Franklin & Marshall College |
Roger.thompson@fandm.edu |
95 |
Peter Urcuioli |
Purdue University |
uche@psych.purdue.edu |
89 |
Tomokazu Ushitani |
Kyoto University |
tushitani@bun.kyoto-u.ac.jp |
100 |
Clementine Vignal |
NAMC CNRS |
clementine.vignal@univ-st-etienne.fr |
83 |
Anna Vlasak |
University of Pennsylvania |
avlasak@sas.upenn.edu |
|
Jennifer Vonk |
University of Louisiana at Lafayette |
jxv9592@lousiana.edu |
15 |
Jennifer Warhawk |
Columbus State University |
warhawk_jennifer@colstate.edu |
56 |
Edward Wasserman |
University of Iowa |
ed-wasserman@uiowa.edu |
20, 78, 103 |
Daniel Werner |
Bridgewater College |
dcw003@bridgewater.edu |
18. 59 |
Ron Weisman |
Queen's University |
79 |
|
Ariel White |
Franklin & Marshall College |
Ariel.White@fandm.edu |
95 |
Bill Whitlow |
Rutgers University |
bwhitlow@camden.rutgers.edu |
10 |
Seth Wilhelmsen |
Auburn University |
|
|
Patricia Wilson |
Columbia University |
pwilson@psych.columbia.edu |
60 |
Anthony Wright |
UT-H Medical School |
anthony.a.wright@uth.tmc.edu |
|
Clive Wynne |
University of Florida |
wynne@ufl.edu |
55, 88 |
Thomas Zentall |
University of Kentucky |
zentall@pop.uky.edu |
28, 64, 93, 101 |
Conference on Comparative
Cognition 2004
5:50 Welcome Remarks – Suzanne MacDonald
6:00-7:03
Spatial Learning Processes (Chair, Suzanne MacDonald)
6:00 David R Brodbeck & Jessica M Humber
(Sir Wilfred Grenfell College - Memorial University)
1-10
Memory for Space/Colour Compound Stimuli
in Pine Siskins (Carduelis
pinus) - A Field Experiment
Pine Siskins (Carduelis
pinus), a species of finch that are common
throughout northern parts of North America) memory for spatial and local cues
was investigated using a field experiment using a cue dissociation method
similar to Brodbeck (1994). Three feeders were placed
3 m apart in the field. Each feeder was
consistently baited with different amounts of sunflower seeds (200 in the red
feeder, 100 in the green and 50 in the yellow) at the start of each (twice
daily) one hour recording session.
During training sessions, the spatial locations of the feeders remained
constant. The birds consistently visited
the red feeder the most, followed by the green and yellow. On unbaited test trials one feeder was
swapped with another (e.g. red with green).
The number of visits to each feeder by the birds was recorded. As expected, the animals searching behaviour was controlled by spatial information.
6:15 Jerome Cohen & Jennifer Vergel DeDios (University of Windsor)
2-10
Retrospective and Prospective Spatial Working Memory in the
Hierarchically Baited Radial Maze
Rats perform more poorly in a 16-arm radial maze when four
different types of food (cereal puffs, fish pellets, sunflower seeds, and rat
pellets)are redundantly cued by different proximally-cued arms at fixed
locations than when these food types at randomly vary over arm locations.
Following initial training on uninterrupted choice sequences, we interrupted
rats in either group after their fourth, or eighth, or twelfth choice. Only the fixed food location group displayed the
retrospective/prospective memory split in performance (Cook, Brown, &
Riley, 1985). That is, their performance was more disrupted after their eighth
than after either their fourth or twelfth choice. Futher
experiments with other rats without redundant proximal arm cues suggest that
fixed food location rats were attempting to retain two kinds of information
(food locations and arm locations sampled) separately in their working memory.
6:30 Kosuke Sawa (Japan Society
for the Promotion of Science, UCLA), Kenneth J Leising,
Cory Fischer, Aaron P Blaisdell (University of
California, Los Angeles)
3-10
Sensory preconditioning of spatial learning
using a touch-screen task with pigeons
The integration of spatial maps in pigeons was investigated using
a spatial search task presented on a touch-screen equipped computer. In Phase 1
of Pavlovian sensory preconditioning, two visual landmarks (LMs
A and B) were presented for 30 s with a consistent spatial relationship without
any reinforcement. In Phase 2, pigeons were required to peck at a hidden
location (goal) on the screen that bore a consistent spatial relationship to LM
A. The distribution of pecks at test suggest that spatial search was guided by
a) a B-Goal spatial vector computed from the sum of the B-A and A-Goal vectors,
and b) generalization of responding from LM A to LM B. The expression of these
processes was influenced by a) whether or not the response field was visually
marked, b) the elapsed time between a retraining session and the test session,
and c) individual differences between pigeons.
6:45 Kenneth J Leising (University of
California, Los Angeles), Kosuke Sawa
(Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, UCLA), Raymond Lo (UCLA), Prat Panda (UCLA), & Aaron P Blaisdell
(UCLA)
4-5
A Pavlovian conditioned inhibition procedure with pigeons
established two visual landmarks as conditioned inhibitors. Inhibitors X and Y
were paired with excitors A and B without
reinforcement (i.e., AX-, BY-). On other trials, both excitors
were presented together with mixed-grain (AB+) if pigeons pecked at a hidden
goal location on the screen. The goal maintained a consistent spatial
relationship to Landmark A but not to Landmark B. Spatial control by the inhibitors
was assessed in summation tests with an excitatory transfer Landmark C.
Inhibitor X was most effective at inhibiting pecks at the goal when the “no
goal” location overlapped spatially with the goal location predicted by
Landmark C. Inhibitor Y showed less spatial specificity of inhibition. Thus,
spatial control by an inhibitory landmark depends on the spatial control by its
excitatory associate. Spatial control of inhibition was also influenced by a)
whether or not the response field was visually marked, and b) individual
differences between pigeons.
Equivalence Learning and the Same/Different Concept (Chair,
Jeff Katz)
7:25 Jamie H Brown, Dana J Gant, Tracey A Spinner, & Mary Jo Rattermann (Franklin & Marshall College)
6-5 (Given as Poster)
Identity is Special: Evidence from human adults and 3-year-old
children
Using the methodology developed by Wasserman and Young (Wasserman,
Fagot & Young, 2001; Young & Wasserman, 2001) a touchscreen
Imac was used to present human adults and 3-year-old
children with either a display of 2 identical icons or a display of 2
non-identical icons. Subjects received an equal number of identity and
non-identity trials, but were only rewarded for touching the screen in the
presence of identity (or non-identity, depending upon condition). Also, the
children were in either a labeled (“same” and
“different”) and an unlabeled condition. As was found in previous research, the
adult subjects touched the screen more for identity displays, regardless of
whether they were reinforced for responding to identity or non-identity. The
children displayed a similar pattern, showing no effect of label. These
findings suggest a predisposition in both children and adults to respond based
on identity. Further, this predisposition is unaffected by the presence of
labels.
7:33 Robert G Cook & Daniel I Brooks (Tufts University)
7-5
Auditory Same/Different Learning in Pigeons
Pigeons were trained in an auditory same/different task using a go/no-go
procedure. Stimuli were drawn from 12 synthesized musical sounds varying in
timbre and pitch. Same trials consisted of an identical sound played for 2 s
and repeated at .5 second intervals. Different trials consisted of all 12
sounds being played in sequence during a trial. After learning the
discrimination, further tests revealed their independent sensitivity to both
the timbre and pitch dimensions. Tests with novel timbre and pitch values
revealed significant discrimination transfer. These results indicate that
pigeon relational learning in not limited to the visual modality, but extends
to the auditory modality as well.
7:41 Bradley R Sturz, Jeffrey S Katz, Kent D
Bodily (Auburn University), & Anthony A Wright (University of Texas Medical
School at Houston)
8-5
Same/Different Concept Learning by Pigeons: The Role of Symmetry
Pigeons trained in a simultaneous same/different task to
discriminate pairs of pictures as same or different completely transferred to
novel stimuli indicating abstract-concept formation. To rule out the
possibility that there was some low-level feature of symmetry that might have
cued responding, we trained and tested the same pigeons with sequential
stimulus presentations. By separating the two stimuli in time, symmetry features
would not be simultaneously present. Complete concept learning occurred
suggesting that symmetry is not a controlling factor in this discrimination.
7:49 Kristy Lindemann, Colleen Reichmuth Kastak, & Ronald J Schusterman (University of California, Santa Cruz)
9-5
Cross-modal equivalence in a California sea lion
In a classic experiment on stimulus equivalence conducted by
Murray Sidman and his colleagues, retarded children
demonstrated emergent reading comprehension following training on
auditory-visual conditional discriminations.
Using a variant of this procedure, we recently showed that California
sea lions are also capable of establishing stimulus classes that meet the
formal properties of equivalence relations (reflexivity, symmetry, and
transitivity). In contrast to Sidman’s original study these classes were comprised of
sets of stimuli from a single modality (vision). The aim of our current research with a sea
lion is to establish multiple auditory-visual conditional discriminations and
then test for emergence of untrained relationships between visual stimuli
linked by a common auditory sample. We
present preliminary data and a model for investigating cross-modal equivalence
in nonhumans.
http://pinnipedlab.ucsc.edu
Snack Break
Learning, Choice, & Reasoning (Chair, Ralph Miller)
8:35 Bill Whitlow (Rutgers University - Camden)
10-10
Associative Analysis of Causal Reasoning
Recent theories of human causal reasoning have focused on problems
in medical diagnosis, food poisoning, and forecasting weather and stock
markets. However, the domain in which people might be expected to be most
expert is social reasoning. This presentation describes studies of social
reasoning in which people decide how one person feels about another (likes,
dislikes, has no feeling for) based on experiences with ratings of
liking/disliking involving a single individual and a group. Comparison of the
results with data from conventional causal reasoning paradigms will be made.
9:05 Martin S Shapiro (California State University, Fresno), Corlisa Belt (Oxford University), & Behmer
T Spencer (Oxford University)
12-10
With the exception of honeybees, there have been few good
invertebrate models for associative learning.
To establish a new protocol for studying learning in a solitary,
herbivorous insect, dessert locust (Schistocerca
gregaria) were trained in three discrimination
experiments (n=12 in each). In
experiment 1, colored arms of a two-sided Y-maze provided a large or small
amount of wheat for nine choice-trials.
In experiment 2, locust discriminated odors, and the wheat rewards were
reversed after nine choice-trials for an additional nine choice-trials. For the third experiment, the locust again
discriminated odors, but the rewards differed in concentration of protein and
carbohydrate. The results of these
experiments indicated that in addition to showing good choice performance, the
locust also took less time to reach the option with the larger reward. These results demonstrate the sensitivity of
this design and are encouraging for the further study of these invertebrates
under different conditions.
9:20 Tyson L Platt, Jonathan G Schuster, Elizabeth J Rahn, Francisco Arcediano, &
Martha Escobar (Auburn University)
13-5
First- and second-order revaluation in a human causality task
The extended comparator hypothesis (Denniston,
Savastano, & Miller, 2001) states that responding
to a target cue (T) is determined by the extent to which other cues presented
with T during training (i.e., comparator stimuli, C1) predict the outcome. In turn, the effectiveness of C1 as a
comparator stimulus depends on the associative status of its own comparator stimulus
(i.e., T’s second-order comparator, C2).
According to the hypothesis, associative changes of C1 have an inverse
effect on responding to T, whereas associative changes of C2 have a direct
effect on responding to T. Contrary to
these predictions, in a human causality experiment we observed that associative
inflation and deflation of C1 had a direct effect on responding to T, whereas
associative inflation and deflation of C2 had an inverse effect on responding
to T. The results are discussed in the
framework of both the extended comparator hypothesis and mediated conditioning
theories.
9:28 Theresa A Foster & Timothy D Hackenberg
(University of Florida)
14-5
Effects Of Response Requirements And Reinforcer Delays On Behavior
In 12-hour sessions, pigeons were exposed to a series of
fixed-ratio schedules and reinforcer magnitudes
arranging equal unit prices (responses per unit food delivery). Fixed-ratio
schedules ranged from 25 to 800 and reinforcer
magnitudes (access to grain) ranged from 2 to 8 seconds. Consistent with
previous findings, results show a positively decelerating relationship between
consumption and unit price, and a bitonic
relationship between response output and unit price. Conditions currently
underway explore the separate contributions of response requirements and reinforcer delay on reinforcer
consumption and responding. To assess effects of reinforcer
delay, average obtained ratio-completion times were programmed in place of a
response requirement. In later conditions, pigeons will choose between
schedules that arrange the same the unit price, but with different cost-benefit
components. Separate effects of response requirement and delay will also be
assessed under these choice conditions.
Theory
of Mind & Metacognition (Chair, Heidi Harley)
9:45 Jennifer M Vonk, James E Reaux, Conni M Castille, & Daniel J Povinelli
(University of Louisiana at Lafayette)
15-10
What Human-Enculturated Apes Know about
Seeing: Preliminary Results
It has been repeatedly suggested that apes raised with humans exhibit a more robust understanding of mental states
than those reared with other apes (Tomasello &
Call, 1996). Povinelli and colleagues (Povinelli & Eddy, 1996; Reaux,
Theall & Povinelli,
1999) systematically investigated seven peer-reared chimpanzees’ understanding
of seeing. In conditions in which one experimenter could see them and another
could not (e.g., blindfolds over the mouth versus the eyes), these chimpanzees
exhibited no initial preference for gesturing to the person who could see them.
The sole exception was the back-versus-front condition in which one individual
faced the subjects and the other faced away. We tested three human-reared
chimpanzees using a subset of these same see/not-see test conditions. The results
were strikingly similar to those of the peer-reared animals. Finally, in a
novel procedure, these subjects were unable to use their first-person
experiences to model the visual experiences of others.
10:00 Megan J Bulloch, Ellen E Furlong, Klaree
J Boose, & Sarah T Boysen
(Ohio State University)
16-10
Chimpanzees have a theory of mind: Comprehension of others'
knowledge states
The ability to discriminate one’s knowledge state from others may
be unique to humans. Studies with
nonhuman primates of this phenomenon, known as Theory of Mind, remain
inconclusive. Different findings reported from several laboratories (e.g., Reaux, Theall & Povinelli, 1999; Tomasello, Call
& Hare, 2003) raise important questions.
We replicated Reaux et al. (1999) with 9
chimpanzees, exploring if chimpanzees recognize that seeing an event creates a
different knowledge state for someone not seeing it. Two experimenters stood in front of a
chimpanzee, each holding a reward. Subjects requested the food by gesturing to
one experimenter. Six experimental conditions included: 1) bucket on head of 1 expter.; none on 2nd;
2) look straight ahead; turned back to subject; 3) look straight ahead;
closed eyes; 4) blindfold over eyes; blindfold over mouth; 5) plain mask next
to face; face covered by mask; 6) look straight ahead; avert eyes to right.
www.chimpcenter.osu.edu
Thursday Afternoon
(12:00 – 6:15)
Ordinality, Magnitude, & Distance (Chair,
Michael Brown)
12:00 Herbert Terrace (Columbia University & NY State Psychiatric
Institute)
17-20
Cognitive Psychophysics in Rhesus Macaques
Magnitude and distance effects have been obtained from human
subjects, both with numerical (Arabic numeral or number of geometrical elements)
and arbitrary (letters of the alphabet) stimuli. Here I describe experiments in which
magnitude and distance effects were obtained from monkeys trained on numerical
and arbitrary lists. Arbitrary lists were composed of photographs; numerical
lists of geometric stimuli of various sizes, colors and shapes. Subjects were
then given 2-item subset tests consisting of all possible pairs that could be
drawn from the arbitrary lists or all possible pairs that could drawn from
numerical stimuli containing 1-9 elements. With distance held constant, the
reaction time (RT) of the response to the first member of a subset increased
linearly with the position of the first member of the subset on the list on
which it was trained (magnitude effect). With magnitude held constant, RT
decreased as the distance between items increased. Using identical stimuli,
similar results were obtained from human subjects.
www.columbia.edu/cu/psychology/primatecognitionlab/index.html
12:25 Stephen B Fountain, Melissa D Muller, & Denise P Smith (Kent
State University)
18-10
Multiple Processes in Rat Sequential Learning
Three hypotheses have dominated the sequential learning
literature: the sequential memory view, the rule learning view, and the serial
position view. Proponents of each have
at times argued that a single mechanism can account for learning in sequential
tasks. We present evidence that in one
sequential learning paradigm rats monitor and learn from multiple sources of
internal and external information concurrently, and doing so recruits multiple
dissociable brain systems.
http://www.personal.kent.edu/~sfountai/
12:40 James D Rowan, Daniel C Werner, Amanda R Willey, Elise M Sims,
& Eric L Landram (Bridgewater College of
Virginia)
19-10
Varying Response Number in an Alternation Learning Task in Rats:
Single, Double, Triple and Quadruple Alternation
Numerous studies have demonstrated that rats have great difficulty
in learning a double alternation pattern as opposed to a single alternation
pattern. This study examined the effect of chunk length on alternation
learning. Rats were trained on a 24 element
pattern of either a single (121212 etc.), double (11221122 etc.), triple
(111222111222 etc.) or quadruple (11112222 etc.) alternation pattern for 5
patterns a day for 40 days. The results
seem to contradict previous research in that performance on the double
alternation pattern was better than on the single alternation pattern. Errors on the single alternation pattern were
the highest when compared to all other groups. As expected, other than the
single alternation pattern, rats’ errors were highest at the switch points
where the rat was required to change responding from one nosepoke
receptacle to the other.
12:55 Brett M Gibson (University of New Hampshire), Edward A Wasserman
(University of Iowa), & Alan C Kamil (University of Nebraska)
20-10
Pigeons Are Efficient Travelers
We presented four adult pigeons with 3 identical 1cm2 back and
white stimuli that were displayed simultaneously on a computer screen; the
location of each stimulus was determined randomly prior to each trial. Each
pigeon had to peck all three stimuli once in any sequence to receive a food
reward. The route the pigeon took to
“travel” to all of the stimuli was recorded and compared to all possible routes
that could potentially be taken for a given problem. Four and five stimuli were presented on the
screen during a second and third experiment, respectively. The routes the pigeons used to “travel” to
the stimuli were reliably more efficient then those used by a Monte Carlo
simulation given the same problems. Pigeons were significantly less efficient
than a nearest neighbor model of performance, however.
Timing
Processes (Chair, Russell Church)
1:20 Melissa Bateson (University of
Newcastle)
21-10
Temporal averaging in foraging starlings
Animals are universally risk-prone for variance in delay to
reward, preferring an option offering a variable delay over one offering a
fixed delay equal to the arithmetic mean of the delays in the variable option.
A number of different functional and mechanistic models have been proposed to
explain this preference. These models differ in the predictions they make
regarding the value of the fixed delay at which a subject should become
indifferent between a fixed and variable-delay option. I present an experiment
on European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) designed to separate these models by
identifying this indifference point. The data show that indifference occurs
when the fixed delay is close to the harmonic mean of the delays in the
variable option. This result rejects the scalar timing theory-based account of
choice between delayed rewards.
1:35 Richard Keen, Paulo Guilhardi,
& Russell Church (Brown University)
22-10
The Effects of Response Contingency on Timing
The goal of the present study was to examine how the contingency
between response and reinforcement affects timing behavior. In appetitive head
entry experiments, groups of rats received food contingent on its head being in
the food cup (Dwell), its head entering the food cup (Entry), or independently
of any response (Classical). These contingencies were either in a fixed
interval or random interval procedure. The reinforcement schedule (Fixed or
Random) affected the response distribution. Response contingency (Dwell, Entry,
or Classical) affected the probability of a response but not the response
distribution. The conclusion was that response contingency affects response
rate, but not timing.
1:50 Mika LM MacInnis (Brown University)
23-5
The Effect on Behavior of Stimulus Onset, Termination, and
Presence
The problem was to determine how the onset, termination, and
presence of a stimulus influences behavior. In this experiment, each of 24 rats was
trained on three instrumental appetitive head entry procedures in which food
was available only at a single time in each procedure, 10, 30, or 110 s
following the beginning of the cycle. A
stimulus traditionally is a filled interval that provides two time markers,
onset and termination. To examine their
effects, on each cycle either zero, one, or two discrete events, or a filled
stimulus, was presented. The results
indicated that the food-to-food interval, the stimulus-onset-to-food interval,
and the termination-to-food interval influenced the pattern of response, while
the presence or absence of a filled interval did not change the response
pattern.
1:58 Paulo Guilhardi (Brown University)
24-5
Predicting Choice on the Basis of Behavior on the Alternatives
The goal was to determine whether choice behavior between
alternatives could be predicted from a combination of the behavior to each of
the alternatives. Twenty-four rats were trained on two signaled peak intervals
(e.g., 15 and 60 s) that were presented at the same or different times. Half
were trained with a single lever, and the others were trained with different
levers for the two intervals. The peak functions indicated that the rats
learned both the times and the combination. A simple quantitative rule based on
the alternatives accounted for the choice performance.
2:06 Jonathon D Crystal (University of Georgia)
25-5
Long-interval timing
It is generally believed that intervals below the circadian range
of entrainment cannot be timed. The
present data document that 16-hour intervals are anticipated. Two mechanisms of anticipation were
tested. Timing based on an endogenous
oscillator is predicted to be self-sustaining, meaning that multiple cycles of
behavior should occur after the termination of periodic, environmental
input. In contrast, a pacemaker-accumulator
mechanism is not self-sustaining. The
present data document that 16-hour intervals are timed after the termination of
periodic input (i.e., self-sustaining).
The conclusion is that long-interval timing is based on an endogenous,
self-sustaining oscillator.
2:14 Rona Russell & Kimberly Kirkpatrick (University of York)
26-5
A demonstration of the instability of temporal bisection
Previous studies have shown that the bisection of two intervals occurs
near the geometric mean (with some notable exceptions). Temporal bisection at
the geometric mean has been an important factor in distinguishing between
different timing theories. We investigated the bisection point of relatively
long intervals, Rats were trained to press one lever following a short duration
and press a different lever following a long duration; testing was conducted
using a maintained generalisation procedure and a
range of test stimuli that fell both between the training stimuli and extended
beyond them. The results indicated that when rats were trained to discriminate
a particular pair of stimuli, different ranges of test stimuli revealed
different bisection points. The location
of the bisection point also changed over the course of testing. These results will be interpreted within the
framework of an adaptation level account.
Social learning (Chair, Clive Wynne)
2:30 Francys Subiaul
(Columbia University), Jessica F Cantlon (Duke
University), Ralph L Holloway (Columbia University), & Herbert S Terrace
(Columbia University & NY State Psychiatric Institute)
27-10
Cognitive Imitation in Rhesus Macaques
Two adult rhesus macaques were trained to execute 4-item lists
composed of arbitrary photographs that were presented simultaneously on a
touch-sensitive monitor. Random changes in their configuration prevented
subjects from learning list as a motor-spatial sequence. Subjects were trained
in a chamber with glass walls on adjacent sides. When an opaque partition was
placed between the walls, subjects had to learn new lists by trial-and-error
(baseline condition). However, when the
partition was removed, subjects could see into the adjacent chamber and learn a
new list from an expert model (social condition). Lists learned in the social condition,
significantly differed from lists learned in baseline (p < .01). However,
lists learned in a social facilitation or computer feedback control condition
did not differ from baseline performance (p > .20). These results offer the
first evidence that monkeys can acquire serial knowledge vicariously from
another monkey.
2:45 Emily D Klein, Nam H Nguyen, & Thomas R. Zentall
(University of Kentucky)
28-5
Imitation of a Two-Action Behavioral Sequence by Pigeons
Imitation of a single response has been demonstrated repeatedly in
birds. Here we examined the extent to which pigeons would imitate an unfamiliar
sequence of two behaviors. The behavioral sequence consisted of a response to a
treadle (either pecking or stepping) followed by a pushing response to a screen
(to the left or to the right) to gain access to food. Results indicated that,
although there were individual differences in the tendency to imitate, the
pigeons showed a significant tendency to match the demonstrated sequence of
behavior.
2:53 Wendi Fellner (Epcot's Living Seas)
& Gordon B Bauer (New College of Florida)
29-5
Synchrony characteristics of neonate bottlenose dolphins change at
the onset of nursing
Synchrony among dolphins is a ubiquitous trait that has been
described in association with many typical activities, such as traveling,
foraging, and social interactions. The synchronous behaviors between a mother
and calf are of particular interest as this early experience may lay a
foundation for adult synchronous interactions. Nine mother-calf pairs of
dolphins were observed for characteristics of synchrony, including proportion
of time spent in synchrony, body positioning, and swimming path. Observations
were divided into three phases: pre-nursing, novice nursing,
and skilled nursing. From pre-nursing to skilled nursing, time spent nursing
increased (0% to 5%) as well as time spent with the calf near the mammary area
in infant position (2% to 16%). Contrarily, time spent in direct contact with
each other decreased (81% to 55%). This change may indicate a shift from direct
physical control by the mother to more cooperative synchronous movement
mediated by learning.
3:01 Adrienne M Cardwell (The Mirage Dolphin Habitat) & Heidi E
Harley (New College of Florida & The Mirage
Dolphin Habitat)
30-5
Cooperative Matching-to-Sample by Bottlenose Dolphins
Two dolphins have learned to perform a cooperative
matching-to-sample task. First, each
blind-folded dolphin learned to perform an echoic 3-alternative
matching-to-sample task with great accuracy (>95%). Then the pair was trained to perform the task
cooperatively. They were positioned on
opposite sides of a 3-object array. At
the beginning of each trial, Dolphin Sample submerged and echolocated
the sample while Dolphin Choice hauled out of the water and did not experience
the sample. After the sample
presentation, Dolphin Choice returned to the water and chose an object from the
array. Both dolphins were reinforced
only when Dolphin Choice chose the alternative that matched the sample. Each dolphin learned to perform both
roles. In the most recent seven 18-trial
sessions with each dolphin as Dolphin Choice, choice accuracy was 65% for one
dolphin, 75% for the other (chance=33%).
Mechanisms mediating choice accuracy in the cooperative task are currently
under investigation.
Snack Break
Poster
Session (3:45 – 6:15) 30 Posters
Stephanie J Babb & Jonathon D Crystal (University of
Georgia)
31-P
Spatial memory in rats after 25 hours
We investigated the time course of spatial-memory decay in rats using
an eight-arm radial maze. It is well established that performance remains high
with retention intervals as long as 4 hours, but declines to chance with a
24-hour retention interval (Beatty & Shavalia,
1980). We reasoned that the chance performance could be due to the similarity
of the retention interval and the inter-trial interval (both are 24 hours).
Consequently, we used a 48-hour inter-trial interval, and the retention
intervals were 1 and 25 hours. The rats were forced to visit four baited arms, followed
by a retention interval and then access to all eight arms. Performance (mean
+/- SEM) was above chance (45%) after the short (84.5% +/- 2.7%) and long (65%
+/- 2.1%) retention intervals. Rat spatial memory apparently lasts at least 25
hours.
Aaron P Blaisdell & Kosuke Sawa (University of
California, Los Angeles)
32-P
CS-Reminder induced
recovery from overshadowing in an appetitive Pavlovian preparation
A number of experiments using conditioned suppression in rats have
demonstrated that the overshadowing deficit can be reversed. For example, post-training exposure to the
overshadowed CS prior to testing (i.e., a reminder treatment) and post-training
extinction of the overshadowing CS have both been shown to alleviate the
overshadowing deficit. These
demonstrations suggest that overshadowing is due to a performance deficit
rather than an acquisition deficit.
However, prior studies using appetitive conditioning or conditioned
taste aversion have failed to demonstrate recovery from overshadowing through
extinction of the overshadowing CS. This
suggests that retrospective revaluation effects, such as recovery from
overshadowing, may be specific to conditioned suppression procedures. We report successful recovery from
overshadowing of appetitive conditioning through a CS reminder treatment,
thereby establishing the generality of retrospective revaluation effects.
Jessica F Cantlon, Kerrie Lewis, &
Elizabeth Brannon (Duke University)
33-P
Monkeys Count up and down: Conditional numerical ordering in
rhesus monkeys
In previous research rhesus macaques were trained to order numerosities in an ascending or descending direction (e.g.,
Brannon & Terrace 1998, 2000; Brannon, Cantlon,
& Terrace, in prep). These studies
demonstrated that monkeys represent ordinal numerical relations but also
suggested that monkeys used the first value in a numerical training sequence as
a reference point. To further
investigate the effects of directional training on the numerical comparative
process, we trained macaques to order the numerical values 1-9 in both
ascending and descending directions conditional upon a color cue. Accuracy on numerical pairs was comparable
when cued to respond in ascending or descending order. Monkeys were subsequently tested with larger
numerical values (10-80) under non-differential reinforcement. Results of these experiments offer important
insights into the comparative process macaques use to make ordinal numerical
judgments and the effects of initial training on performance.
Dana L Church (University of Ottawa)
34-P
How Do Bumblebees Spatially Encode Artificial Flowers in a
Laboratory?
Previously, bumblebees were presented a row of artificial flowers
in a flight cage, one offering reward (S+). Each bee was trained to obtain
nectar from the S+ and then individually tested using empty (i.e., unrewarding)
flowers. Chosen flower position and response type (approach, land, or probe)
were recorded. Test manipulations revealed that the presence or absence of
ostensible scent marks was inconsistent in predicting choice of, and behaviour on, test flowers, and that memory for absolute
position of the S+ was used in choosing flowers. Thus, the S-s were not used as landmarks. The next step was to determine whether
the S+ was remembered using egocentric or allocentric cues. Using similar
methodology, bees were given the choice of two flowers during testing: one
would be chosen if the bee used dead reckoning, and
the other if the bee used some external cue(s).
Tara K Clarke, Nicole M Naniche, Caitlyn
H Owens, & Charles J Heyser (Franklin and
Marshall College)
35-P
Selection of Objects in Exploration Tasks
Object exploration is an increasingly popular experimental paradigm.
This task is appealing because there is no explicit need for food or water
restriction and several behavioral endpoints can be obtained rapidly including:
general activity, reactivity to novelty, and learning (e.g. recognition
memory). After our initial use of the novel object exploration task it became
clear that the selection of objects is of critical importance and special
attention should be given to the species-typical behavior of the organism. The
key is that an animal may recognize that some object is novel, indicating that
it remembers what objects were present before, but may not explore the object
due to differences in affordances among the objects.
Results from these initial studies along with the effects of stress on object
exploration will be discussed.
Ellen E Furlong, Megan J Bulloch, Klaree
J Boose, & Sarah T Boysen
(Ohio State University)
36-P
Raking It In: Chimpanzees Recognize The
Mechanical Properties Of Tools
There is conflicting evidence as to whether nonhuman primates
understand causal relationships, particularly during tool use. Povinelli (2000) described 27 tool tasks that his 7
adolescent chimps typically failed. We
recently replicated several tasks, including the flimsy vs. rigid tool task to
examine if our 9 chimpanzees (ages 3 û 44 yrs) would choose the appropriate
tool based on its physical properties.
The chimps were given two rakes (one flimsy and one rigid) to acquire a
food reward, but only the rigid tool was functional. All subjects were successful (Overall CR: 75%,
p < .01). A second study will
examine tool use in 2 tasks, requiring a rigid and flimsy tool,
respectively. These results suggest that
chimpanzees readily grasp the nature of the physical relations between a tool
and reward, likely mediated by the same conceptual understanding related to
folk physics observed in human infants (Brown, 1990).
Elizabeth V Hallinan, Jeffrey R Stevens,
& Marc D Hauser (Harvard University)
37-P
But Wait, There’s More! Temporal
Discounting In Cotton-Top Tamarins
(Saguinus oedipus)
And Common Marmosets (Callithrix
jacchus)
Although probably all animals discount future
rewards, the extent to which they discount varies across species. The discounting rates of two callitrichid primates, cotton-top tamarins
(Saguinus oedipus)
and common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus), were estimated using an adjusting-delay
procedure in which subjects chose between a small food reward at fixed delays
and a larger food reward at varying delays.
For both species, the value of the reward decreased rapidly with
increasing delay; however, tamarins discounted at a
higher rate than marmosets. The
differences in discounting rates between the two species may be attributed to
differences in feeding ecology.
Robert R Hampton & Elisabeth A Murray (National
Institute of Mental Health)
38-P
Dissociation of Memory Systems by Perirhinal
Cortex Removal in Rhesus Monkeys Using a Process
Dissociation
Dissociations of memory systems are typically made using different
cognitive tests. However, it can be argued that such tests are never pure
measures of a single memory system, because multiple systems are always active.
In process dissociation procedures (PDP) two memory processes both cooperate
and interfere in performance of a single cognitive test, thus permitting
quantitative estimates of the contributions of each process (e.g. Hay &
Jacoby, 1996). We used PDP to measure the contributions of habit and
recognition memory to visual matching-to-sample. To produce habits a subset of
images was correct, and rewarded, more frequently than others across days. The
results dissociate recognition memory and habit within a single cognitive test,
and emphasize the importance of perirhinal cortex for
recognition memory. PDP can be applied in monkeys in a way that parallels its
use in humans, thereby providing a new tool for investigating the neurobiology
of memory in nonhumans.
Megan L Hoffman & Bennett L Schwartz (Florida International
University)
39-P
Communication Of Where An Event Occurred
By A Gorilla (Gorilla gorilla gorilla)
Episodic-like memory for the location where a novel event occurred
was examined in an adult male gorilla (Gorilla gorilla
gorilla). The
gorilla witnessed a unique event, performed by an experimenter (e.g. watching
an experimenter blow bubbles) at one of three distinct locations surrounding
his enclosure. After a 4 to 17 minute
retention interval, an experimentally blind tester presented the gorilla with
photographs of the three locations, which were mounted on wooden cards, and
asked the gorilla where the event occurred.
The gorilla communicated his choice by handing a card to the
tester. The gorilla identified the
location where the event had occurred on 45% of the trials, which was
significantly above chance (33%).
Results suggest that the gorilla was not responding on the basis of
familiarity (that is, by choosing his most recent location in the enclosure),
but choosing the location where the novel event occurred.
Erica A Hoy & Dorothy M Fragaszy
(University of Georgia)
40-P
Monkeys and Mazes: To what extent do capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) plan
their actions when solving two-dimensional
detour problems?
Planning was examined in four capuchin monkeys
who completed a series of 192 two-dimensional computer mazes. These mazes differed in terms of number of
choice points (0-5) and number of “non-obvious” choices (0-3). Non-obvious choices were those in which the
incorrect choice appeared to lead more directly to the goal than the correct
choice. The number of choices and non-obvious
choices varied randomly throughout the testing sequence. Planning abilities
were measured in terms of the frequency and type of errors made by subjects
while navigating through the mazes.
Results of this study were compared to those of a similar study in which
three capuchins solved the same computer mazes in order of increasing
difficulty. In addition, we investigated
the apparent inability of subjects in the present study to inhibit incorrect
moves including "dead-ends" and reversals.
Kerry E Jordan & Elizabeth M Brannon (Duke University)
41-P
Cardinal number representation in rhesus macaques
We used a delayed match-to-sample task to test the abstract nature
of cardinal number representations in non-human primates. First, three rhesus monkeys learned to match
visual arrays of 2 and 8 elements based on number, regardless of continuous
dimensions (such as surface area). Secondly, monkeys were tested with samples
of 1-9 elements and test stimuli of 2 and 8 elements. The probability that monkeys selected the
stimulus with 8 elements systematically increased with sample numerosity. Further
experiments tested macaques’ abilities to make more precise numerical matches
(e.g., match 4 small red circles with 4 large green circles of a different
spatial configuration) and the effect of varying sample duration on
accuracy. These experiments provide
evidence that rhesus macaques possess abstract cardinal number representations,
interpolate novel values along an ordinal continuum, and use a ratio comparison
rule. Future investigations will test
monkeys’ abilities to match across modalities based on number.
Juliane Kaminski, Juliane
Bräuer,
Josep Call, & Michael Tomasello
(Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology)
42-P
A comparison of the use of causal and communicative cues in an
object choice paradigm between dogs (Canis familiaris) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)
Dogs are outstanding in their ability to use
different communicative cues independent from their age or experience with
humans. Chimpanzees as our closest relatives to some degree solve different
causal problems but fail to use communicative cues in the object choice task.
One hypothesis is that understanding causality is a very important skill for
undomesticated species whereas using communicative cues is important for
domesticated species. A direct comparison of chimpanzee to dogs, could give an
answer to this question. In our study we presented dogs and chimpanzees with
the same experimental setup testing different kinds of cues. Some of the cues
were social and communicative, some of them were social and intentional and
some were causal. The results suggest that dogs are significantly better than
the chimpanzees in using all the different social cues, whereas the chimpanzees
are significantly better than the dogs in using the different causal cues
provided.
http://www.eva.mpg.de/psycho/index.html
Nate Kornell & Herbert
S Terrace (Columbia University & NY State Psychiatric Institute)
43-P
Information Seeking in Rhesus Macaques
An earlier experiment showed that monkeys can assess the accuracy
of their responses on a memory task retrospectively. Here we investigate their
ability to evaluate uncertainty prospectively, and to request more information
when they are uncertain. Two rhesus macaques were trained in a simultaneous
chaining paradigm to touch four arbitrarily selected photographs in a fixed
order on a touch sensitive monitor. If a subject didn’t remember the correct
order, he could request a hint in the form of a border that flashed around the
correct item. This "hint" could be requested for any or all items
within a given trial. Correct responses were rewarded with a 190 mg banana
pellet on trials completed with the benefit of one or more hints, or a highly
preferred M&M on trials completed without hints. Subjects requested hints
mainly during training on a new list but not after they had learned it well.
This shows that monkeys will seek information when they are uncertain about
their memories.
Shannon MA Kundey & Laurie R Santos
(Yale University)
44-P
What happened where, when?
Examining episodic-like memory in Capuchins (Cebus
apella)
Humans’ memory for what, where, and when of personal events is
termed episodic memory. Many researchers
have questioned whether nonhuman animals share this ability. Without the capacity for language, many have
argued, an organism could not possibly represent or reason about events in a
similar way to humans. Clayton’s recent
work with food-storing jays suggests that several features of episodic memory
might not be exclusive to humans.
However, many have been wary of accepting these claims. Our lab seeks to develop a paradigm to
examine episodic-like memory in nonhuman primates (hereafter, primates). Is it reasonable to think that the ability to
represent personally significant events emerged only in humans and not our
closest primate relatives? Moreover, are
there situations in primates’ lives where we could reliably observe episodic-like
memory, if it exists? Like humans, many
primates lead complex lives that require tracking enormous amounts of
information (i.e. food sources and social encounters). The complexity of their lives suggests that
the capacity to represent episodic-like memories would afford advantages to
primates in successfully negotiating their complicated world. This poster highlights our progress in
examining episodic-like memory in primates.
http://pantheon.yale.edu/~lrs32/
Katherine A Leighty
(University of Georgia)
45-P
Object Recognition from 2D Images in Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)
Studies show that nonhumans can equate 3D objects and 2D
depictions, but have not determined if this is done by representing the
object’s global form or matching for local details across dimension. I attempt to parse out these alternatives by
interactive cross-dimensional search task.
In experiment 1, subjects haptically searched
a 2D depiction of a 6-door cabinet via a touchscreen. The cabinet was constructed such that local
details were equated. Upon revealing the
food reward, subjects were presented with the 3D cabinet and their door choices
were recorded. In experiment 2,
distinctive local details were added above each cabinet door. Subjects did not perform above chance levels
in experiment 1. Results from experiment
2 and further experiments will determine the subjects’ comprehension of this
task as well as the ability to develop a global examining the abilities of 4
adult symbol-using chimpanzees to complete an
representation from a 2D image.
Jody L Lewis & Alan C Kamil
(University of Nebraska -Lincoln)
46-P
How do nutcrackers minimize interference? Testing the effect of inter-list intervals
Recently, we have demonstrated that Clark's nutcrackers, despite
their excellent spatial memory abilities, are subject to proactive and
retroactive interference. Previous
studies with rats have shown that an increase in the interval between spatial
lists can reduce interference effects on recall. In order to determine the
effects of inter-list interval on nutcrackers, we are testing memory for lists
of spatial locations using a win-stay procedure in an open room. Each bird is
tested for recall of two consecutive lists with either a long or short interval
between. We expect that a longer (60 minute)
interval between lists will lessen the effects of proactive interference
compared to a shorter (5 minute) interval.
Kerrie P Lewis, Sarah Jaffe, & Elizabeth M Brannon (Duke
University)
47-P
Numerical cognition in prosimian
primates
While the study of cognition in monkeys and apes is a broad and
burgeoning area of research, there is a great paucity of research addressing
cognitive processes in prosimians. Here, we present
two investigations conducted at the Duke University Primate Center, examining the
quantitative capacities and learning abilities of two species of lemur:
ring-tailed lemurs (Lemur catta) and mongoose
lemurs (Eulemur mongoz). Various studies have documented that the food
quantity judgments of primates are sensitive to the ratio of the quantities
compared (e.g., Beran, 2001; Call, 2000). In accordance with these studies, we present
a series of experiments demonstrating that lemurs’ food quantity judgments
follow Weber’s Law. In a second set of
experiments, we demonstrate that lemurs can be tested in a touch-screen
paradigm and are able to learn 3- and 4-item lists. These studies suggest
fundamental similarities in number and list-learning abilities in prosimian and anthropoid apes.
Dustin J Merritt & Herbert S Terrace (Columbia University
& NY State Psychiatric Institute)
48-P
An analysis of transitivity in rhesus macaques
The current set of experiments was designed to examine how monkeys
organize and represent lists during inferred-order judgment tasks. Two monkeys were trained on a transitive
inference task (A>B, C >D, etc.), and were later tested with non-adjacent
pairs selected from both within and between lists (B>D, C>E, etc.). Performance was above chance during testing,
and further, accuracy and reaction time patterns were consistent with both
ends-inward scanning processes (positional and associative), as well as
positional comparison processes. To
discriminate between these mechanisms, associative interference was created by
training adjacent positions with one of two possible items per position, each
appearing randomly per trial. The
findings suggested that the monkeys used positional information when making
order judgments. Current experiments are examining whether the positional information
is relative or absolute, and whether accuracy and reaction time patterns shown
by monkeys are qualitatively similar to those demonstrated by human subjects.
Christina L Miner (Emory University), James D Rowan (Bridgewater
College of Virginia), P. Taylor Johnson (Tufts University), & Shannon MA Kundey (Yale University)
49-P
Rule-Flexibility in Humans and Rats in Serial Pattern Learning:
Pattern Dispersal
Studies of serial-pattern learning have revealed that rats and
humans are capable of both learning and using rules. However, the literature has failed to
adequately address the issue of whether both species are capable of
transferring learned rules to novel situations in serial patterns. In an experiment using rats and humans as
subjects, half of each species were transferred to a reversed three-chunk
pattern interleaved with 8's, and the remaining subjects were transferred to a
reversed four-chunk pattern interleaved with 8's. Subjects, both humans and rats, in all groups
learned to track their pattern.
Additionally, subjects transferred from a three-chunk pattern to a
reversed, dispersed three-chunk pattern to a reversed, dispersed three-chunk
pattern showed savings in comparison to all other groups. The results support the idea that rats and
humans form a flexible representation of a given pattern and are capable of
transferring previously learned information to a novel, complex situation.
Tammy D Moscrip (Columbia University),
Herbert S Terrace (Columbia University & NY State Psychiatric Institute),
Harold A Sackeim (New York State Psychiatric
Institute), & Sarah H Lisanby (New York State
Psychiatric Institute)
50-P
A Primate Model Of The Cognitive And
Electrophysiological Effects Of Electroconvulsive Shock (Ecs)
And Magnetic Seizure Therapy (Mst)
Although electroconvulsive shock (ECS) is the
most effective treatment for depression, it can produce both anterograde and retrograde amnesia as side effects. Like
ECS, magnetic seizure therapy (MST) induces generalized seizures, but, because
it is more focused than ECS, it may induce less severe cognitive impairment. We
assessed the cognitive effects of ECS and MST in nonhuman primates and also
measured the electrophysiology of induced seizures. Rhesus macaques were
trained on a cognitive battery composed of tests of long-term, short-term and
serial memory. Subjects completed most tasks more rapidly and more accurately
following MST than ECS. These
differences were greatest on the tasks measuring short-term memory and the
recall of 3-item lists. Intracerebral EEG recordings revealed that ECS produced
greater global power and induced-voltage than MST, in particular, in the hippocampal region. It appears, therefore, that the frontal
and hippocampal areas may be more sensitive to the
effects of seizures induced by ECS than by MST.
Tadd B Patton, Scott A Husband, & Toru Shimizu
(University of South Florida)
51-P
Seeing Is Not Enough: ZENK Expression for Visual Conspecific Recognition in the Avian Brain
Little is known about the brain structures associated with visual conspecific recognition.
In order to isolate such brain regions, we studied distribution patterns
of the immediate early gene protein, ZENK, which is believed to be a crucial
step in long-term memory formation. Male
pigeons were exposed to different visual stimuli (e.g., live females,
videotaped females) and then their brain tissues were examined to evaluate ZENK
expression. Results showed that several
visual and non-visual structures exhibited more ZENK than other regions. Furthermore, although the subjects courted
similarly to both live and videotaped females, the live female stimulus
triggered more numerous and intensely stained ZENK than the videotaped
stimulus. This suggests that the
courtship behavior itself was not directly related to the increased ZENK
expression. The real-time interactions
with a live potential mate, rather than passive visual stimulation, were
important for increased ZENK expression in the higher visual areas.
http://chuma.cas.usf.edu/~shimizu
Matthew J Pizzo & Jonathon D Crystal
(University of Georgia)
52-P
Evidence for an alternation strategy in a daily time-place task
There has been some controversy over what type of mechanism rats
use to solve a daily time-place task.
Rats (n=10) were tested twice daily in a T-maze. Food was available at one location in the
morning and at the opposite location in the afternoon. After the rats learned to visit each location
at the appropriate time, omission tests were conducted to evaluate whether the
rats were utilizing time of day or an alternation strategy. Performance on this test was significantly
lower than chance. A second manipulation
involving a phase advance of the light cycle was conducted to test the
alternation strategy and timing with respect to the light cycle. There was no difference between probe and
baseline performance. These results
suggest that the rats used an alternation strategy in a daily time-place task.
Jesse E Purdy (Southwestern University)
53-P
Empirical and Functional Analyses of Trills in Male Weddell Seals
Thomas and Kuechle (1982) documented
that the Weddell seal produces twelve distinct calls that are subdivided into
34 different Call Types. These Calls are categorized on the basis of frequency,
duration, repetition rate, and the presence or absence of harmonics and/or
auxiliary sounds. The 12 Calls are designated with letters and include T, G, P,
E, C, H, K, A, R, Z, L, and M. It appears that only male Weddell seals produce
T, R, E, G, and A vocalizations. Calls C, P, K, M, H, and Z are used by both
male and female seals. It is not clear whether L sounds are gender specific. In
general, males are more vocal than females and Weddell seals are more vocal
during the reproductive season (October-December) than at other times of the
year. Parijs, Lydersen, and
Kovacs (2003) used sophisticated hydroaccoustical
arrays to record the trill vocalizations of bearded seals in the Arctic. The
authors found significant individual variation in trill vocalizations that
correlated with different mating strategies. In essence Parijs,
et al., showed that territorial males had significantly longer trill
vocalizations. Males using a "roaming" strategy were less successful
and their trills were shorter on average than "territorial" males.
Given that territorial males appeared to enjoy greater reproductive success,
the authors argued that trill duration might indicate male quality in bearded
seals. In the present study, we sought to determine if individual variation of
trill characteristics existed in male Weddell seals and, if so, could these
differences be used by females to predict male quality. We examined trill
characteristics of a focal Weddell seal male as it defended its hole against
several males and attempted to attract female seals over a period of six weeks.
Preliminary analyses of the trill vocalizations suggest that whereas measures
of frequency modulation remain fairly constant over the breeding season, the
duration of the trills tended to increase over the course of the breeding
season. In addition, it appears that trill duration of the resident male was
longer on average than the trills of background males. Results are discussed in
light of the reproductive strategies of male Weddell seals and their
counterparts in the Arctic, the bearded seals.
Carrie R Rosengart & Dorothy M Fragaszy (University of Georgia)
54-P
Motor Priming in a Spatial Memory Task in Capuchin Monkeys (Cebus apella)
The A-not-B task has been used to determine if individuals can
correctly find an object hidden at a new location (B) after multiple trials
where it has been hidden at an original location (A). If motor priming is
responsible for impairment of B trial search accuracy, then trials with shorter
search latencies should reflect the individual’s initial impulse to search at
the primed A location, resulting in an error. Six capuchin monkeys were tested to determine
the role of motor priming in B trial performance deficits in recall and
recognitions tasks, with delays between hiding and the opportunity to retrieve
the food reward either 0s or 10s. Latency was measured as the time between
search access and the first search attempt. In both recall and recognition
tasks, longer delays and shorter search latencies impaired performance
indicating that motor priming is partially responsible for errors.
Kathryn A Saulsgiver, Erin McClure,
& Clive D Wynne (University of Florida)
55-P
Effects of Amphetamine on Symbolic Matching to Sample of Duration
stimuli in pigeons
We studied the effects of 0.75, 1.5, 2.25, and 3.0 mg/kg of d-amphetamine
on pigeons’ performance on a Symbolic Matching to Sample Duration procedure.
The houselight was illuminated for either 2 or 8 s
(randomized across trials) followed immediately by red and green illumination
of two pecking keys. Responses on the red key were reinforced following 2 s houselight presentations and on the green key after 8 s
duration stimuli. Four intervening values were added: 2.6, 3.48, 4.6, and 6.1 s
û where responses on red were reinforced for durations under 4 s; and responses
on green for durations over 4 s.
Comparisons of psychophysical functions obtain before, during and after
drug administration were compared. A
general flattening of the sigmoid curve occurred under drug administration at
higher doses, indicating a disruption in the perception of all durations.
Results are interpreted in terms of amphetamine’s effects on stimulus control
of behavior.
Mark S Schmidt, Jennifer R Warhawk,
& Joseph A Garcia (Columbus State University)
56-P
Numerousness Discrimination in Rats
Three experiments were conducted to test rats' ability to acquire
conceptual two-choice visual numerousness discriminations. A touch-screen
presented stimuli (white dots) and recorded responses. In Experiment 1, three
rats were trained on a 3:4 discrimination with trial-unique dot displays
(probes) presented on either 20% or 5% of trials. All subjects performed at
chance on both training trials and probes. In Experiment 2, four rats were
trained on a 3:6 discrimination with probes presented
on all trials. All subjects performed at chance. In Experiment 3, four rats
were trained on a 2:5 discrimination without probes.
All subjects learned this discrimination. Probes were then presented on 25%,
followed by 75% of trials. All subjects performed significantly above chance on
the probes indicating acquisition of a conceptual
numerousness discrimination. Testing continues to determine the nature and
limits of this ability in these subjects.
Marcia L Spetch & Alinda Friedman (University of Alberta)
57-P
Do pigeons recognize the correspondence between objects and images
of the objects?
Static images of objects or scenes presented on computer monitors
are increasingly used to study cognitive processes in pigeons. Nevertheless,
evidence that pigeons recognize the correspondence between images and real-life
objects or scenes has been mixed. We investigated transfer of object
discriminations from real objects to images and vice versa. Pigeons in one group were trained to
discriminate between two identically-colored objects that differed in global
shape. Pigeons in the other group were trained to discriminate between images
of these objects. Following acquisition,
pigeons trained with real objects were transferred to pictures and vice
versa. Some pigeons were transferred
with the same contingencies (positive object stayed positive) and others were transferred with
reversed contingencies (positive object became negative and vice versa). Accuracy following transfer was compared for
the same and reversed contingencies to determine whether the pigeons recognized
the correspondence between the objects viewed directly and those seen in
images.
Jeffrey R Stevens & Marc D Hauser (Dept. of Psychology,
Harvard University)
58-P
Quantity discrimination in two callitrichid
primate species
According to Weber’s law, accuracy of discrimination between two
amounts should increase with the ratio between their magnitudes. Two New World primate species - cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) and common marmosets
(Callithrix jacchus)
- were tested in a quantity discrimination task. In this task, the monkeys could choose
between two visible rewards (linear arrays of food pellets). As expected, both species chose the larger of
the two rewards more frequently as the ratio of their magnitudes
increased. Interestingly, marmosets tend
to choose the larger reward more frequently than the tamarins,
and marmosets appear to have a lower discrimination ratio. Despite similar ecology and social systems, tamarins and marmosets seem to have different quantification
abilities.
http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/~mnkylab/
Daniel C Werner, Ashley E. Huddleston, Amanda R. Willey, Thomas W.
Crosby, & James D. Rowan (Bridgewater College of Virginia)
59-P
The Effects, or Lack Thereof, of Interference on Double Alternation
Learning: Double Alternation Versus Double Response
Rats have great difficulty in learning a double alternation
pattern. Some explanations assume that
in double alternation interference rapidly builds because of the limited number
of stimuli choices (2) and the great number of trials. Traditionally, one way that interference has
been lessened is by the use of a larger stimulus set to draw the responses
from. In this experiment, rats’
performance on a double alternation task is compared to performance on a double
response task in which rats were required to make two nosepoke
responses in a row and then switch to a nosepoke
receptacle to the right in a circular array of 8 nosepoke
receptacles. The results indicate that
increasing the stimulus set from which the responses are drawn from has no
effect on learning. The rats learned to
produce a double response pattern in both cases and the groups did not vary in
errors nor in the topography of the error profiles.
Patricia A Wilson & Herbert Terrace (Columbia University &
NY State Psychiatric Institute)
60-P
Rhesus macaques recognize 4 list items in an unordered
delayed-matching-to-successive-sample task
Two rhesus monkeys were trained on a
delayed-matching-to-successive-sample task. The sample contained 3-4
arbitrarily chosen photographs. The same 3-4 photographs, along with 1-6
distracters, were presented simultaneously during the test phase of each trial.
Subjects were rewarded for selecting all of the sample items in the list, in
any order, without responding to any of the distracters. Both subjects were
able to retrieve the entire contents of working memory (all 3 or 4 of the
sample items) from arrays containing as many as 6 distracters. Accuracy, output
order, and reaction time functions were analogous to those obtained in free
recall experiments on adult humans. A strong recency effect was observed but
there was no evidence of a primacy effect. The absence of a primacy effect,
which is also common in children under the age of 5 (Flavell,
1966), may reflect subjects’ inability to use a rehearsal strategy.
Angelo Santi & Chris Hope (Wilfrid Laurier University)
61-P
Pigeons' memory for number of light flashes: Effects of intertrial interval and delay interval illumination
Pigeons were trained to discriminate sequences of light flashes
(illumination of the feeder) that varied in number but not time (2f/4s and
8f/4s). When the delay interval (DI) was dark, a choose-small bias was observed
at DIs longer than the training DI, and a
choose-large bias was observed at a DI shorter than the training DI.
Differentiating ITI and DI illumination conditions did not attenuate these
response biases. When the DI was illuminated, a choose-large bias was observed
at DIs longer than the training DI. Increasing the
duration of the second flash on small sample trials reduced accuracy to chance
levels. Pigeons appeared to code these number samples by timing and summing
flash duration rather than by using an event switch.
http://www.wlu.ca/%7Ewwwpsych/asanti/asanti2.htm
Gabriela L Bravo, Kerry McAuliffe, William D Stalhman,
Ariel E White, & Roger KR Thompson (Franklin & Marshall College)
95-P
Spontaneous Selective Attention to Stimulus Dimensions by Macaque
Monkeys (M. mulatta)
Unlike pigeons, (Wasserman et al, 2002) aged rhesus monkeys in a
successive implicit discrimination task failed to reliably discriminate between
“same & different” relations instantiated by arrays of either 16 identical
or 16 non identical icons even after as many as in fifty 48-trial sessions (Flemming, et al., 2003). Were the comparatively poorer
performances of the monkeys attributable to the abstract relational dimensions
of the 16-icon stimulus arrays (i.e., relative entropy), age related visual
deficits, or the response demands & reinforcement contingencies associated
with the implicit task? Results from two aged rhesus monkeys tested with the
same implicit discrimination procedure, but with discriminative stimuli varying
in geometric form, size, and monochromatic color implicate perceptual
insensitivity û spontaneous selective inattention - to the abstract dimensions
of the multiple icon arrays as the discriminative handicap rather than either
the discriminability of individual stimuli or the
contingencies & response demands of the discrimination procedure
Fred Stollnitz (National Science Foundation
61A-P
Opportunities for NSF employment, reviewing, and support
The National Science Foundation (www.nsf.gov)
supports research and education in comparative cognition, as it does in nearly
all fields of science that are not disease-oriented.
Projects that integrate research and
education are particularly welcome, as in the new Science of Learning Centers
(SLC), Research in Undergraduate Institutions, Faculty Early
Career Development, Research on Learning
and Education, Research Experiences for Teachers, Research Experiences for
Undergraduates, and Undergraduate Mentoring in
Environmental Biology (defined broadly
enough to include comparative cognition!).
Research in comparative cognition is supported primarily in the
Directorate for Biological
Sciences; single-focus projects are
supported in the Animal Behavior Program, while large, multifaceted projects
(e.g., SLC, Frontiers in Biological Research) are supported through
NSF-wide or
Directorate-wide programs. The Directorate for Education and Human
Resources supports projects for teacher enhancement; course, curriculum and
laboratory
improvement,
and informal education of the general public through zoo or museum exhibits,
films or TV programs, etc. Opportunities
to serve as a science assistant, as a program
officer,
or as a reviewer are available in many NSF programs.
Friday
Afternoon (12:30 – 6:30)
Spatial
Cues and Spatial Control (Chair, Jon Crystal)
12:30 Michael F Brown & Jason Drott
(Villanova University)
62-10
The effects of spatial patterns on spatial
search
Rats searched for food hidden on top of vertical poles in a 5 X 5
matrix of poles. On each trial, half of
the poles were baited. For all rats, the
identity of the baited poles was unpredictable over trials. For some rats, the baited poles always formed
a checkerboard spatial pattern. For
other rats, the baited poles were chosen randomly on each trial. Differences in the search behavior and
performance of these two experimental groups confirm that the checkerboard
pattern controlled choices and provide information about the details of spatial
pattern learning.
12:45 Debbie M Kelly, Erica Robak,& Alan C Kamil (University of
Nebraska-Lincoln)
63-10
Encoding of Geometric and Featural cues
in an open environment by Clark’s nutcrackers
Many investigations examining the encoding of geometric and featural cues have used a fully enclosed search space
(i.e., Cheng, 1986) where the shape of the enclosure provides geometric
information and objects within the enclosure provide featural
cues. We investigated the encoding of
such information by Clark’s nutcrackers using an open environment where discrete
objects provide not only the featural information,
but the rectangular configuration of the objects provides geometric
information. Birds were trained to
search for a reward at one corner of the array, the orientation of which varied
across trials. Birds trained with four unique objects quickly solved the task,
whereas after many sessions birds trained with four identical objects were
unable to. Transformation tests examined
whether birds trained with unique objects had coded the geometric properties of
the array (even though this was not necessary to solve the task) and to
determine how many of the objects were encoded.
1:00 Rebecca A Singer & Thomas R Zentall
(University of Kentucky)
64-5
Effect of Proximal Cues on Cognitive Map Formation in Rats
We tested the ability of rats to form and use a cognitive
map. Rats were trained to retrieve food
rewards from goal boxes baited at the ends of the same two spatially distinct
arms of a three-arm maze. Each arm, but
not the goal box, was uniquely textured which allowed the rats to orient
themselves within the maze. On test
trials, rats were allowed to choose between two novel pathways from the center
goal box, one of which led to the goal box that had been baited in training and
the other which led to the goal box that had been empty in training. Results showed that the rats chose the novel
shortcut that led to the arm that had been baited in training significantly
above chance. These results indicate
that in the absence of landmarks on test trials, rats were able to navigate
using an internal map on their environment.
1:08 Shannon I Skov-Rackette & Sara J Shettleworth (University of Toronto)
65-5
Senseless Spatial Learning
Previous researchers have suggested that animals encode the
overall geometry of arrays of objects when exploring them, but they have
generally failed to control for a variety of non-geometric cues. Our earlier experiments suggested that while
rats do encode some spatial relationships among objects in an array, such as
inter object distances, they do not encode the overall shape of the array in
the same way as they encode the geometry of enclosures. In the experiments to
be described, responses to changes in the geometry of an array were tested by
changing spatial relationships among three objects. Disoriented rats
encountered a triangular array of objects while searching for randomly
scattered food in a large arena that was devoid of landmarks. When the triangle
was transformed into its mirror image, the rats did not reexplore,
even when the objects were very distinct from one another. However they
responded strongly when the identity of one of the objects was changed. Thus
rats do not appear to encode sense (left-right relationships) in this
situation, and this information may be encoded separately from identification
information.
1:16 Sylvain Fiset (Université de Moncton,
campus d'Edmundston)
66-5
Use of landmark configurations in domestic dogs
The aim of this experiment was to determine how domestic dogs use a
configuration of landmarks to locate a spatial position. The dogs' (N=5) task
was to find a buried object (a ball) hidden under a thin layer of woodchips in
the middle of four identical landmarks. During training, the entire array of
landmarks was moved about in the area from trial to trial. During testing,
training and test trials were mixed. On control tests, the ball was removed. On
expansion tests, the ball was removed and the size of the landmark array was
double along one dimension or along both dimensions. Data revealed that on
control tests, domestic dogs searched accurately at the center of the array. On
expansion tests, dogs tended to search at locations that were approximately at
the correct distance and direction from one or two landmarks. These results are
discussed from a comparative perspective.
Mechanisms
of Learning (Chair, Bill Whitlow)
1:35 Oskar Pineño & Ralph R.
Miller (SUNY-Binghamton)
67-10
We provide evidence of spontaneous recovery following both forward
and backward blocking in a conditioned suppression preparation with rats.
Experiments 1 and 2 found an attenuation of both forward and backward blocking
following a retention interval. Experiment 2 showed that recovery of responding
to the blocked stimulus cannot be explained by an impaired status of the
blocking stimulus after a retention interval. Finally, Experiment 3 found that
the within-compound association between the blocking stimulus and the blocked
stimulus wanes during a retention interval. Therefore, Experiment 3 suggested
that spontaneous recovery following both forward and backward blocking
(Experiments 1 and 2) is due to an impaired associative activation of the
blocking stimulus during testing with the blocked stimulus. Although no
contemporary model of associative learning can explain these results, a
modification of Miller and Matzel’s (1988) comparator
hypothesis is proposed to do so.
1:50 Nestor A Schmajuk & Jose A Larrauri (Duke University)
68-10
Attentional Coding by Dopamine
Neurons
We show, through computer simulations, that an existing model of
classical conditioning presented by Schmajuk, Lam,
and Gray (1996) can replicate experimental results regarding (1) the activity
of dopaminergic neurons in the ventral tegmental area of monkeys during conditioning with
different probabilities of reinforcement, (2) dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens of rats during the different phases of latent
inhibition, and (3) dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens
of rats during the different stages of sensory preconditioning. Overall, the
results seem to support the view that, in classical conditioning, dopamine
codes variables related to attention.
http://psychweb.psych.duke.edu/department/cnlab/Fiorillo1.htm.
2:05 Karen L Roper (Wake Forest University)
69-10
Differences in the differential outcomes effect for reinforcer quality and reinforcer
location in rats.
Rats that received qualitatively different outcomes (sweetened
condensed milk or pellets) correlated with correct lever position in a tone/no
tone conditional discrimination learned at the same rate as a group that was
also given these qualitatively different outcomes in distinct spatial positions
(differential presentation of the left or right feeder). Learning in both of these groups was faster
than when outcomes differed only in terms of outcome location. Superiority of outcome quality on rate of
acquisition was evident across two different tests of the quality/position
conditions. In a transfer experiment,
rats given both features of the outcome correlated with a correct choice were
trained either on new samples or the same samples, and given either a partial
reversal (only one feature consistent with the prior phase) or a full reversal
(neither feature consistent) of these outcomes to further document this effect.
2:20 Kimberly Kirkpatrick & Domhnall
Jennings (University of York)
70-5
Temporal predictability modulates the magnitude of the blocking
effect in rats
Groups of rats received a blocking treatment in which initial
training was given with a 30-s fixed (F) or random (R) duration stimulus that was
followed by food delivery. In a subsequent testing phase, the rats then
received either a 30-s fixed or random duration novel stimulus in compound with
the pretrained stimulus (FF, FR, RF, RR). The rate of head entries into the food cup served as
the measure of conditioning. All four conditions demonstrated a retardation in responding to the novel stimulus compared
to control groups that received no pre-treatment. However, the magnitude of
this retardation varied between conditions. The blocking effect was most robust
in the RR group and was weakest in the RF group. The results indicate that
temporal predictability modulates the strength of the blocking effect.
Predators, Prey, & Feeding (Chair, David Brodbeck)
2:30 Alan B Bond & Alan C Kamil (University
of Nebraska, Lincoln)
71-10
Background heterogeneity and the evolution of polymorphism
We have used operant technology to devise a technique we call
virtual ecology. In virtual ecology
experiments, blue jays (Cyanocitta cristata) search for digital moths whose appearance is
determined by a genome. When the
probability of successful reproduction is made dependent on avoiding blue jay
predation, these digital moths evolve.
We can now use these procedures to test a variety of hypotheses about
evolution in predator-prey systems. We
have recently applied virtual ecology to pattern and scale, a central problem
in ecology and evolution, but a notoriously difficult one to study empirically. Different populations of moths evolved under
predatory selection by blue jays on resting backgrounds that varied in
heterogeneity. The nature of the
background affected the evolutionary path taken by the moth populations,
demonstrating the importance of heterogeneity in the evolution of prey
polymorphism.
2:45 Linda A Parker (Wilfrid Laurier
University)
73-5
Is the rat gape the same as the shrew retch?
Rats don't vomit, but shrews do.
When infused with a flavor previously paired with a treatment that
produces vomiting in shrews, rats gape. anti-emetic drugs interfere with the establishment and the
expression of lithium-induced conditioned gaping in rats. The shrew retch, which is topographically
similar to the rat gape is displayed just prior to
drug-induced vomiting. Is the rat gape a
vestigial vomiting response in this non-emetic species?
Snack Break
A Celebration of the Influence of Donald Blough
(Chair, Bob Cook)
3:40 Robert Cook (Tufts University)
75-15
The Search for Truth and Beauty
The capacity to attend to and locate relevant information in the
varied backgrounds that comprise the world is critical to any foraging animal.
The numerous and important contributions of the Bloughs
to our understanding of the mechanisms of visual search are reviewed and placed
in historical context. The central role of attention in these processes is
emphasized. In addition, recent studies from our own lab will be presented
examining the global and local factors in the visual search for structured
information.
3:55 Russell Church (Brown University)
76-15
Methods and Models in the Study of Animal Cognition
The methods and models adapted and developed by Donald Blough for research with animals continue
to have an important influence on animal cognition research. These include the
experimental methods of animal psychophysics, the use of computers for all
stages of research, simple quantitative functions relating procedural variables
to behavioral measures, and quantitative models of psychological processes. An
example will be given of these influences on a packet theory of timing. The
goal of this theory is to generate times of responses from a large class of
conditioning and timing procedures that are difficult to distinguish from those
produced by animals tested on the same procedures.
4:10 William A Roberts (University of Western Ontario)
77-15
Donald Blough and The
Study of Working Memory in Pigeons
In a classic article, Donald Blough
(1959) demonstrated delayed matching-to-sample in pigeons. His paper described a procedure and findings
that were the forerunnerof dozens of studies of
short-term or working memory in pigeons.
I will discuss some of the major findings inspired by Blough's technique, including the forgetting curve,
directed forgetting, memory for time and number, and default coding.
4:25 Edward A. Wasserman, Olga F. Lazareva, & Shaun P. Vecera
(University of Iowa)
78-15
Object
discrimination in pigeons: The roles of
global and local cues
Humans can
selectively attend to individual objects in cluttered scenes. How might non-mammalian animals segregate a
visual scene into multiple candidate objects?
To help find out, we trained two pigeons with a DRH/DRL procedure to
discriminate a pair of differently shaped and colored objects (e.g., a green
oval and a red rectangle) that contained two target spots either on the same
object or on each of the two different objects.
Both pigeons learned this task, evidencing a strong discrimination
between two classes of training stimuli (which varied in the orientation of the
objects, the objects’ absolute locations, the exact locations of the target
spots, and which of the two shapes contained the two target dots on same
trials). Follow-up tests disclosed
strong control by the color, but not the shape of the objects. Furthermore, a colored region surrounding the
dots proved to be critical, but not adequate to support the discrimination,
suggesting that the pigeons attended to both local and global properties of the
visual stimuli.
4:40 Ronald Weisman (Queen's University),
Andrea Friedrich, Dennis Morrell, & Thomas Zentall
(University of Kentucky)
79-15
Absolute
Pitch: forget about whether music training matters; what matters is whether you
are a mammal or a bird.
Absolute
pitch perception (AP) refers to the ability to identify, classify, and memorize
pitches without use of an external reference pitch. In previously published
tests of AP, several species of birds and mammals were trained to sort
contiguous tones into 8, 5-tone frequency ranges, based on correlations between
responding to tones in each frequency range and reinforcement. Species from two
avian orders (songbirds and parrots that learn complex songs and calls) had
highly accurate AP in 8-range discriminations. Two mammalian species (humans
and rats) had poor AP; they acquired only a crude discrimination of the lowest
and highest of 8 frequency ranges. In the present experiments, pigeons (an
avian species with relatively simple unlearned calls) were more similar in
their frequency-range discriminations to other avian species than to mammals.
5:10 – 6:10 Master
Lecture
80
Banquet – Friday Evening
(7:15)
Saturday
(10:30 – 6:35)
Business Meeting of the Comparative Cognition Society (10:30
– 11:30)
All welcome to attend. Members of the society may vote.
Group Photo (11:35)
Communication (Chair, Ron Weisman)
11:45 Nicolas Mathevon &
Thierry Aubin (Equipe
'Communications Acoustiques' NAMC CNRS)
81-10
Acoustic communication in tropical forest: How does the simple and
stereotyped song
of the White-browed Warbler transmit information?
An abundant bird of the Brazilian atlantic forest, the White-Browed
Warbler Basileuterus leucoblepharus,
presents a simple and stereotyped territorial song which is particularly
sensitive to propagation through dense vegetation. Which information can be
supported by this non-sophisticated and fragile signal? By acoustic analysis
and playback experiments, we have shown that, for species-specific
identification, birds use features resistant to degradation and ignore those
sensitive to propagation. Conversely, information about individual identity is
supported by acoustic cues susceptible to propagation-induced modifications. By
playback experiments with propagated signals, we have shown also that
white-browed warblers can assess the emitter distance by relying upon signal
degradation. Finally, by modifying the duration of its songs, a bird may send
information about its motivational state. Thus, in spite of the simplicity of
its acoustic structure and of the propagation problems due to tropical forest,
the song of the White-browed Warbler allows an efficient transmission of
several important messages: species-specific and individual identities,
location and motivation of the emitter.
http://www.cb.u-psud.fr/cb/index.html
12:00 David Mann, Mandy Hill, Brandon Casper (University of South
Florida), Debborah E Colbert (Mote Marine
Laboratory), Joseph C Gaspard III (University of
South Florida), Roger L Reep (University of Florida),
& Gordon B Bauer (New College of Florida)
82-10
Auditory Temporal Resolution of the Florida Manatee (Trichechus manatus latirostris)
Hearing sensitivities in two Florida manatees were assessed using
auditory evoked potential methods.
Preliminary results of these tests indicate that the frequency range of
detection extends from at least 200 Hz (lowest frequency tested) to 40
kHz. The temporal resolution of the
manatee auditory system was also indirectly measured using the Envelope
Following Response (EFR) technique. This
involves presenting an amplitude-modulated (AM) tone and measuring the effect
of changes in the AM rate on the level of the evoked potential. Animals with higher temporal resolution
abilities show responses to signals with higher rates of AM. Both manatees could follow rates of AM up to
600 Hz. These results are consistent
with the relatively high frequency sensitivity of manatees (which is often
directly related to temporal resolution), and they also suggest that manatees
may have the ability to use time of arrival cues to localize underwater sound.
12:15 Clementine Vignal (Equipe
Communications Acoustiques NAMC CNRS and TSI CNRS),
Nicolas Mathevon (Equipe
Communications Acoustiques NAMC CNRS), Stephane Ramstein (TSI CNRS), Stephane Mottin (TSI CNRS),
& Thierry Aubin (Equipe
Communications Acoustiques NAMC eCNRS)
83-5
Audience drives male response to mate’s voice in Zebra finches
Behaviours and especially the attitude towards the
opposite sex are influenced by social environment. Are male songbirds able to
adjust their response to female voices depending on the particular composition
of the audience? Using a playback experiment, we show that the vocal response
of male Zebra finches to the calls of their regular mate is enhanced only in
the presence of a mated pair, and then is significantly modified by the sex and
the mating status of the audience, whereas their response to the calls of a
familiar female is not.This individual recognition
should rely on cognition processes of acoustic signals. An in-vivo and
non-invasive neuromethod of investigation of cerebral
activation linked to vocal communication remains a challenge: we develop femtosecond white laser transillumination
of the intact head of the bird associated with time-resolved spectroscopy to
probe variations of cerebral blood volume and haemoglobin
saturation during acoustic processing.
http://www.cb.u-psud.fr/cb/index.html
12:23 Julia H Orth (New
College of Florida) & Heidi E Harley (New College of Florida and Epcot's The Living Seas of Walt Disney World Resorts)
84-5
Whistle Rates in a Group of Bottlenose Dolphins Over
Changes in Composition
Bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) are social animals with strong sound reception
and production abilities. Aspects of their vocal behavior such as signature
whistles and mimicry have been studied in detail. Little is known about their
general vocal behavior. We lack information such as normal vocal repertoire or
the conditions in which vocalizations are most likely to occur. This study
examines whistle production rates of a group of male dolphins across changes in
composition. One dolphin was present throughout the study. Whistle rates were
analyzed before and after the death of one individual, following the two-staged
introduction of another individual, and following the introduction of another
individual. Whistles were disproportionately common with more animals, an
effect which seems partly attributable to the extensive vocalization of the
newly-introduced dolphin. This suggests individual variation in whistle
production rate and that the presence of conspecifics
excites vocal response.
Comparative
and General Process Approaches (Chair, Ed Wasserman)
12:40 Michael Lamport Commons (Harvard Medical
School) & Patrice Marie Miller (Salem State College)
85-10
Using
Hierarchical Complexity to Determine Developmental Stages in Animals
One difficulty in comparing the highest stages that various
animals attain is the traditional tasks used to test human behaviors cannot be
directly applied to animals, nor can the tasks for one animal always be applied
to another. The Model of Hierarchical
Complexity (MHC) can help determine the stages of animal behavior as well as
human behavior. It does so by taking the
actions and tasks that animals and humans engage in, and putting them into an
order based upon how hierarchically complex they are. Stage of performance has the same name and
number as the corresponding order of hierarchical complexity of the task it
correctly completes. An animal species
is characterized by the highest stage of performance observed of any member of
that species any amount of training.
Animals are observed to engage in actions up the concrete stage of
development, which is about what 8 to 10 year old children do.
http://dareassociation.org/
12:55 Patrice Marie Miller (Salem State College and Harvard Medical School),
Michael Lamport Commons (Harvard Medical School),
& Miriam Chernoff (Harvard Medical School)
86-10
What Archeological Evidence tells us about the Stage of Reasoning
of Hominids as they Evolved
We used archeological evidence from a series of Hominids, to
estimate what their stage of action would have had to be to develop technology
the ways that they did. Tool use and
manufacture; and food gathering activities will be examined. Such an examination allows us to understand
the developmental stage of various Hominids.
To discuss developmental stage of action in Hominids, we introduce basic
concepts from the General Hierarchical Complexity Model. That model takes actions and tasks and puts
them into an order based upon how hierarchically complex they are. Stage of performance has the same number as
the corresponding order of the hierarchical complexity of the task it correctly
completes. Hominids are characterized by
the highest stage of performance observed of any member of that species. The development stages hominids passed
through with evolution were concrete (common to ancestors of homo
sapiens and chimpanzees), abstract, formal and systematic.
http://dareassociation.org/
1:10 Chuck Locurto (College of the Holy
Cross)
87-10
The structure of early acquisition
We have been studying the structure of individual differences in
mouse cognition. Our findings have not always revealed the presence of a robust
general factor (i.e., first principal component) as is typically found in human
cognition. Instead, we have observed what appears to be a more modular
structure. The tasks used in our batteries require a number of sessions to
complete. There is a suggestion in the literature that clearer evidence of a
general factor may be found if each task is run for only a few trials, thereby
capturing early acquisition performance instead of performance following
extended training. We have developed a battery in which each task was designed
to provide evidence of learning within a few trials. Moreover, each task was distinct in terms of
motivation, sensory modality and/or behavior measured, thereby providing a
strong test of the presence of a general factor.
1:25 Clive DL Wynne (University of Florida)
88-10
The Perils of Anthropomorphism
In the last decade several researchers in animal cognition have argued that anthropomorphism can serve a constructive role in aiding our understanding of the psychology of other species. I will argue to the contrary: Treating animals as people is not good science. Though old-time behaviorism may have been too constraining, in the reintroduction of anthropomorphism we risk bringing back the dirty bathwater as we rescue the baby. I will consider several recent examples of misplaced anthropomorphism including the claims of a sense of “fairness” in monkeys; “metacognition” (awareness of what one knows and doesn’t know) in monkeys and dolphins, and mirror self-recognition in apes and dolphins. Better progress would be made in understanding animal cognition if we concentrated on investigating the stimulus conditions that control the behaviors under investigation and were less concerned with demonstrating superficial similarity to human states of mind.
http://www.psych.ufl.edu/~wynne/Wynnefairrefusal.pdf
http://www.psych.ufl.edu/~wynne/Wynneperilsanthrop.pdf
Discrimination Learning (Chair, Karen Roper)
1:50 Peter J Urcuioli (Purdue University)
89-10
When discrimination fails (or at least falters)
Pigeons were concurrently trained on four simultaneous
discriminations in which left versus right key pecks were reinforced depending
on the color displayed on one of two lit keys.
As training progressed, choices routinely became less accurate on trials
requiring a peck to the (relevant) color cue than on trials requiring a peck to
the irrelevant cue. This effect was
especially pronounced when color-directed pecks were intermittently
reinforced. Indeed, with partial
reinforcement, choice accuracy on trials requiring a color-directed peck fell
almost to zero for some birds (i.e., birds rarely pecked at the partially
reinforced color despite the fact that pecking the alternative stimulus was
never reinforced!) By contrast,
discrimination performances were maintained at high levels of accuracy on
trials requiring a peck to the irrelevant cue even when these pecks were
reinforced only 10% of the time. These
results appear to be explicable in terms of value transfer.
2:05 Bennett L Schwartz, Megan L Hoffman, & Genevieve P Tessier (Florida International University)
90-10
Delayed match-to-sample in golden-lion tamarins
(Leontopithecus rosalia)
Delayed match-to-sample tasks have been used in a wide variety of
species to assess working memory. In this study, we examined three adult male
golden-lion tamarins (Leontopithecus
rosalia) in a delayed match-to-sample task. An
initial sample (a blue square, green circle, or red triangle) was presented.
Approximately 10 seconds later, the tamarins choose
between the correct answer and a distractor. The
correct answer varied across trials semi-randomly. The distractor
and the position of the correct and distractor varied
across trials. Correct answers were
reinforced by allowing the tamarin to extract a
blueberry from an opening in the match stimulus. Two of the tamarins
failed to learn the task after approximately 200 trials each, but the third
improved to above-chance accuracy by 200 trials, with performance leveling out
at 65%. Implications and future directions are discussed.
www.fiu.edu/~schwartb/primate.html
2:20 Caroline M DeLong (New College of
Florida), Whitlow W Au (Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology), & Herbert L Roitblat
(DolphinSearch, Inc.)
91-10
Echo features used by human listeners to discriminate among
objects: Insight into dolphin perception and performance
Echolocating dolphins extract object
feature information from the acoustic parameters of echoes. However, little is
known about which object features are salient to dolphins or how they extract
those features. To gain insight into how
dolphins might be extracting feature information, human listeners were
presented with echoes from objects used in a dolphin echoic-visual cross-modal
matching task. Human participants
performed a task similar to the one the dolphin performed,
however, echoic samples consisting of 23-echo trains were presented via
headphones. The participants performed as well or better than the dolphin (M =
88.0% correct), and reported using a combination of cues to extract object
features (e.g., loudness, pitch, timbre).
Participants frequently reported using the pattern of changes in the
echoes across the echo train to identify the shape and structure of the
objects. It is likely that dolphins also use changes across echoes as objects
are echolocated.
2:35 Taichi Kusayama &
Shigeru Watanabe (Keio University)
92-5
Discrimination of two human facial expressions by Japanese jungle
crows
The present experiment examined whether crows discriminate human
facial expressions or not. Japanese jungle crows (Corvus
macrorhynchos) were trained to discriminate
between two facial expressions, namely “smile face” and “normal face”, using colour slides. We used an operant chamber with a
transparent pecking key. Stimuli were back projected on a screen by a slide
projector and the crow
could see these stimuli through the pecking key. During one
training session, pecking to one facial expression was reinforced by dog foods
while pecking to the other one was extinguished. The training continued until
they attained both 90% discrimination ratios and 0.9 rho
value on two successive sessions. In the test,
transfer to facial expressions of novel people was examined. They could
discriminate facial expressions of these novel people after being trained with
the faces of several people. We also examined the transfer to 3D models and
real human faces.
2:43 Kelly A DiGian & Thomas R Zentall (University of Kentucky)
93-5
Stimuli that follow a delay are preferred over those that follow
no delay
Clement, Feltus, Kaiser, and Zentall (2000) reported that pigeons prefer discriminative
stimuli that require greater effort (more pecks) to obtain over those that
require less effort. In the present experiment we asked whether pigeons would
prefer stimuli that followed a delay over those that followed no delay.
Anticipation of delay was manipulated by signaling its occurrence in the
experimental group. Results indicated that delays can produce preferences
similar to those produced by effort but only if they are signaled.
2:51 Scott Husband & Toru Shimizu (University of
South Florida)
94-5
Common Mechanisms of Cognitive Flexibility in Birds and Mammals
Previous anatomical data suggest that avian medial striatum (MStr) contains a structure comparable to mammalian nucleus accumbens (Acc).
Although Acc plays a critical role in attention and goal-directed
behavior, it is not directly involved in sensory processes. For instance, lesions to Acc impair reversal
learning without affecting sensory discrimination. To determine whether MStr
is also functionally equivalent to Acc, we examined MStr
lesion effects on simultaneous pattern discrimination and reversal learning
sessions in pigeons. Both lesion
subjects and controls performed similarly on original discrimination. Furthermore, MStr
lesion birds, as well as some sham-lesion controls, had increased errors in
reversal sessions compared to non lesion controls. Error patterns indicated that the sham-lesion
birds have deficits due to position preference whereas MStr
lesion birds had fixation on previous reward contingencies (cognitive
rigidity). These results are consistent
with the assumption that avian MStr is functionally
equivalent to the mammalian Acc. Supported by NSF.
http://chuma.cas.usf.edu/~shimizu
2:59 P. Taylor Johnson & Robert Cook (Tufts University)
96-5
Object Localization in Pictures by Pigeons
Last year, it was reported that pigeons acquired an object
perception task n which they were required to locate a target object from an
array of objects within a picture. In new experiments to be reported, the
pigeons successfully transferred to variations in object location relative to
other objects within a test picture. In
tests using novel objects, the birds were unsuccessful at identifying new
object stimuli, either in the context of old stimuli (1 new object presented
with 3 old objects) or all new stimuli (pictures with 4 completely new
objects). Other variations on the discrimination task will be presented. Implications on object perception, matching
to sample, and visual search will be discussed.
Snack Break
Motion
& Rhythm (Chair, Herb Terrace)
3:55 Heidi E Harley (New College of Florida &
Epcot's Living Seas), Wendi Fellner (Epcot's Living
Seas), & Leslie Larsen-Plott (Epcot's Living
Seas)
97-10
Rhythm Production by the Bottlenose Dolphin
Previous work with dolphins suggests that dolphins can
discriminate among acoustic rhythms. The
current study investigates the dolphin’s ability to produce rhythms. A bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops
truncatus) uniquely labeled three objects with
three rhythms. When presented with an object,
the dolphin used its rostrum (bottlenose) to tap out a rhythm on a
pneumatically controlled in-air switch connected to a computer’s USB port that
controlled tone-generating software. The
14-kHz tones were simultaneously played on an in-air speaker and represented
spectrographically on a computer screen.
The dolphin was reinforced for playing a series of short tones, a single
long tone, or a short and long tone in response to three specific objects. Performance accuracy on the most recent 50
object-labeling trials with each object was 82%, 94%, and 72%. The dolphin is currently learning a fourth
object-rhythm pair.
4:10 Angie C Koban & Robert G Cook (Tufts
University)
98-5
The Influence of Temporal Characteristics on a Pigeon Motion
Discrimination Task
Four pigeons were tested in a directional motion discrimination
task. Object stimuli composed of a red cube, tube, cone, and torus. Each was
rotated left or right around a central axis in a go/no-go procedure. To examine
the nature of the discrimination the number of frames and timing per rotation
were systematically varied. The results
suggested that pigeons are better able to perceive directional object movement
when presented at faster rates, are unable to use object direction if presented
too slowly, and need smooth coherent object motion in order to make the
discrimination. Implications for using video stimuli to portray motion will be
discussed.
4:18 Hiroshi Makino (Chiba University)
99-5
Pigeons’ discrimination of dynamic images of objects rotating in
depth
In a go/no-go discrimination procedure, four pigeons were trained
to discriminate two objects dynamically rotating in depth. The objects were
composed of three identical rectangular solids, but differed in arrangement of
them. Two pigeons acquired the discrimination, and then they were exposed to
three types of testing. They showed good transfer to static images included in
the training stimuli. But they didn’t show transfer to dynamic images of the
objects whose angle of projection was changed. And they didnÆt
show the kinetic depth effect with dynamic stimuli in which all contour and
surface information were eliminated. The results were suggested that the
pigeons acquired the discrimination based on two-dimensional cues of the
objects.
4:26 Tomokazu Ushitani, Kazuo
Fujita, & Akira Sato (Kyoto University)
100-5
Perceptual organization of motion in pigeons
We investigated how pigeons perceptually organize motion of more
than one object. We hypothesized that if pigeons organize components sharing a
common movement vector to one group, the pigeons would perceive relative motion
of the components. We trained pigeons to match a target dot moving vertically
to one color and the same dot moving diagonally to another. We presented an
accompanying dot moving horizontally near the target. The pigeons were thought
to match the diagonal motion to the color for vertical motion and vice versa if
they perceived relative motion. The results showed no evidence that pigeons perceived relative motion. However, when a moving
frame was substituted for accompanying dots, the pigeons tended to respond to
the color corresponding to relative motion. Pigeons may organize a set of
moving objects as one object moving relative to the other at least in some
stimulus displays.
4:34 Tracy I Martin & Thomas R Zentall
(University of Kentucky)
101-5
Effect Of Penalty Time On Acquisition Of
Matching To Sample In Pigeons: The Role Of Post Choice Information Processing
The matching-to-sample task is used extensively with
pigeons to measure learning. A modification of matching-to-sample, the penalty
time procedure, incorporates four seconds, after incorrect choices, during
which the discriminative stimuli are maintained. Responses must be withheld
during the penalty time to advance to the next trial. Facilitation of matching
behavior is found with the penalty time procedure. Penalty time may provide
post choice information that is beneficial to future matching behavior and/or
penalty time may be aversive to the pigeon and
encourage caution in making comparison choices.
A penalty time group was compared with a misinformation group in which
the sample changed to the non-selected stimulus during the penalty time, which
provided misleading post choice information, but maintained penalty aversiveness. The penalty time group learned significantly
faster than the misinformation group, which suggests that post choice information may be more important than aversiveness
in facilitating a matching-to-sample task.
Categories
& Concepts (Chair, Tom Zentall)
4:50 Satoru Ishikawa (Hokkaido University), Hika
Kuroshima (Kyoto University), & Kazuo Fujita
(Kyoto University)
102-10
Hierarchical Concepts And Abstract
Relations In Capuchin Monkeys (Cebus apella)
Conceptualization and representation of abstract relations are
important considerations in the evolution of cognitive ability in animals. In
this study, we confirm the emergence of representation of abstract relations
from conceptual behavior in capuchin monkeys (Cebus
apella). First, we trained monkeys to acquire
several concepts having hierarchical relations among them. Then, we
investigated their performance toward the relations among visual symbols used
in acquiring the concepts. If the monkeys learn spontaneously
abstract relations (hierarchy) among concepts during concept acquisition
training, they respond appropriately in the test. As a result, three capuchin
monkeys acquired four basic and two higher-order concepts simultaneously.
Furthermore, the test results of abstract relations of symbols suggest that
capuchins are capable of eliciting abstract relations among symbols thorough
learning relations among concepts. These results indicate that the ability to
represent abstract relations derive from conceptual ability.
5:05 Olga F. Lazareva,
Kate L. Freiburger, and Edward A. Wasserman
(University of Iowa)
103-10
Pigeons
concurrently categorize photographs at both basic and superordinate
levels
We studied
categorization in pigeons using carefully controlled photographs. Within daily sessions, four pigeons had to
classify each of 32
photographs into either its proper basic-level category (cars,
chairs, flowers, or people; four-key forced-choice procedure) or its proper superordinate-level category (natural or artificial;
two-key forced-choice procedure). The
pigeons successfully classified the same stimuli at both levels. Overall, the pigeons learned the basic
discrimination faster than the superordinate
discrimination; but, this difference was only reliable for artificial stimuli
(cars and chairs), not for natural stimuli (flowers and people). The pigeons also exhibited reliable
discrimination transfer to novel photographs, attesting to the open-endedness
of these basic and superordinate categories. In follow-up experiments, we further examined
the differences between natural and artificial stimuli and between basic and superordinate categorization tasks.
5:20 Stephen EG Lea, Andy J Wills, & Catriona
ME Ryan (University of Exeter)
104-10
Why is it hard for birds to learn to discriminate artificial
polymorphous concepts?
Artificial polymorphous concepts, in which
category membership is dependent on m out of n independent features taking
positive values, have been widely used as models for natural concepts. They share the property of natural concepts
that there is no single, simple, necessary or sufficient condition for category
membership. But whereas birds quickly
learn to discriminate between sets of stimuli defined in terms of natural
concepts, discrimination of artificial polymorphous concepts is frequently slow
and incomplete. Chickens were trained in
successive discriminations of stimulus sets that resembled 3-out-of-5
artificial polymorphous categories in four ways: stimulus complexity, the need
to attend to multiple stimulus dimensions on each trial, the need to remember
the valences of multiple features between trials, and the unreliability of the
association between reinforcement and each feature. The results suggest that multidimensionality and
reinforcement unreliability cause most difficulty when birds are trained to
discriminate polymorphous concepts.
5:35 Guillermo C Paz-y-Mino, Alan B Bond,
Alan C Kamil (University of Nebraska-Lincoln), &
Russell P Balda (Northern Arizona University)
105-10
Inferential and categorical judgment in a highly social bird
Social complexity may have provided an important setting for the
evolution of intelligence. In a large stable society it is unlikely that an
individual could learn and remember all possible relationships among group
members. Instead, selection might have favored the evolution of mechanisms of
inference and classification. This role of social complexity has been
historically attributed mostly to primates. Here we document how pinyon jays (Gymnorhinus
cyanocephalus), one of the most highly social
North American corvids, use transitive inference to
rank the dominance performance of specific individuals in relation to the
status of group mates. These findings support the hypothesis that not only primates
but other vertebrates exposed to equivalent social and ecological pressures
have evolved comparable cognitive traits.
http://bsweb.unl.edu/avcog/
5:50 Lisa K Son (Barnard College), Nate Kornell (Columbia University), Herbert S Terrace (Columbia
University & NY State Psychiatric Institute), Danielle Sussan
(Barnard College), & Molly E Flaherty (Columbia University)
106-10
Measuring confidence judgments non-verbally by using a betting
paradigm
Two rhesus macaque monkeys were trained to make confidence
judgments on perceptual and memory tasks by using a betting paradigm. The
perceptual tasks required subjects to discriminate the size and number of
various stimuli. The memory task required subjects to select a recently viewed
photograph that was presented with 8 distractor
photographs. Following each response on
the perceptual and memory task, subjects were shown two risk icons, one
representing a large bet; the other, a low bet. Subjects earned 3 tokens if
they chose the high-bet icon following a correct response but lost 3 tokens if
they chose that icon following an incorrect response. One token was earned
anytime they chose a low-bet icon. The monkeys learned to respond to the bet
icons appropriately, improving on each subsequent perceptual task, and on the
first day on which they were presented with the memory task. Potential
educational applications will be discussed.
6:05 Tammy LB McKenzie, Leanne R Bird, & William
A Roberts (The University of Western Ontario)
107-10
What do pigeons learn when forming categories?
During training, pigeons in Group 1 were trained to respond to
images of houses (S+) and dogs (S-). Pigeons in Group 2 received the opposite
training. Upon testing, novel exemplars of the S+ and S- categories and
exemplars from a novel category (flowers) were introduced. During test session
one, pigeons from both training situations responded to flowers and dogs in a
similar manner and to houses in the opposite manner. Pigeons may have learned
more about the houses than the dogs and pecked at novel stimuli based on a
response strategy that they developed during training. Pigeons may have adopted
either the strategy “peck at houses and do not peck at all other pictures” or
the strategy “do not peck at houses and peck at all other pictures”. Therefore,
pigeons may develop exclusion strategies in a concept learning task.
6:20 Eduardo Mercado III (University at Buffalo, SUNY), Itzel Orduna (Rutgers
University), & Jeaveen M Nowak (University at
Buffalo, SUNY)
108-5
Auditory Classification of Complex Sounds by Rats
Little research has explored the auditory categorization abilities
of mammals. To better understand these
processes, we tested the abilities of rats to classify multidimensional
acoustic stimuli using a classic category learning task developed by Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961). Rats proved to be able to
classify eight sounds as containing either fast or slow frequency modulation,
and as exhibiting either ascending or descending frequency modulation. Our results show that when rats are required
to classify complex sounds along one of multiple possible dimensions, their
ability to do so improves slowly and incrementally, consistent with the
predictions of associative models of classification learning.
6:28 – 6:35 Tom Zentall Closing Remarks